No, because he probably had a decent defence of 4 to cover him while Szczesny was only protected by 2 and 2 halves.
Printable View
No, because he probably had a decent defence of 4 to cover him while Szczesny was only protected by 2 and 2 halves.
You can't call Szczesny a clown, he did well last season, and was one of the few bright spots of an otherwise dark campaign.
http://blogs.soccernet.com/onthemove/Quote:
14.09 DONE DEAL: Sunderland have signed Connor Wickham on a four-year deal from Ipswich. For around £8 million, possibly rising to £13 million.
Thank fuck that finally rules us out, although looking at the fee... if Oxlade-Chambermonkey's is similar that will be shocking.
:clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Joker
You can't call Szczesny a clown, he did well last season, and was one of the few bright spots of an otherwise dark campaign.
and with a decent defence in front of him will only get better......my Villa mate says that Szghsjafgh does not command the area enough or use his voice......I beg to differ.....any thoughts?