Originally Posted by
Fist of Lehmann
I remember posting at the start of the season that Ozil was a great start, but that we needed at least 2 more Ozil level signings to properly compete. My thinking was based on some simple maths. Overall we've done very well to date but the Premiership is an asymmetrical race, everyone plays everyone else at different times so it can take some time before the results start to even out.
What we saw on Saturday may have been the start of our evening.
So to a degree I understand the reaction. For years we've been sold the vision of cake tomorrow instead of cake today. This year we've outperformed expectations, people started to believe that the cake had finally arrived. But for me cake this year would be ahead of schedule.
When you make structural changes to a business, or social reforms, or in fact any fundamental change to a large complex system, often those changes take time, months or even years, for their effects to filter down. Chelsea won nothing in their 1st year of Russian mafia money, Man City didn't win the league until their 4th year of obscene oil money spending.
The change is there, definitely. We culled deadwood ruthlessly, even when cancelling contracts or allowing free transfer cost us money. We sold no first teamers (unless you count Gervinho). We broke our transfer record on a single player by more than 2.5 times and signed the second most expensive player in Premier League history.
Whether this is sustained change though remains to be seen. Our last 5 transfers were Ozil + 2 frees (Flamini and Sanogo) and 2 loans (Viviano and Kallstrom). The difficulties aside, signing Count Draxula could have been the marker put down, a clear sign of intent. Aside from whatever he did on the pitch it would have given encouragement to a tiring squad, and renewed faith that the management was as motivated to win things as they were.
As things are now, people are starting to wonder whether the cake was illusionary.