Super Super Quality Transfer Speculation & Shit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GB.

Your face never happened.

---

Meaning I never had a face, so your whole point is moo. And so's your face.

The thing that's odd about this transfer window (again) is the lack of new people coming to GW for up to the minute information.

Anyone realise that Denilson is coming back <_< . So don't expect any signings now.

He`ll be like a new signing. Brilliant!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GB.

Who says I don't ask that question?

---

Not sure, not seen you ask it on here, instead you ask me :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ItsMe

Yes he did, but that was the deal to join and he agreed, he signed a 4 year deal. He played ok but with 3 years left on his contract I'd tell him to swivel for it, we're not a charity and he signed a deal and at 30 he's not exactly marketable.

Might seem harsh, but we've been screwed over by players enough times, time to get tough with these contracts, had we been we might not have some unproven nobodies on small fortunes.

---

so you decide to screw over a play who took less money and WANTED to join us and WANTS to be here and was a very important part of our team this season?

Think about that for a second. Now if you truely feel that way then you have absolutely no right to shit on a player who plays games in wanting to leave us because you want to screw players who want to be here and are vital for us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Globalgunner

The thought that a player we really wanted took a pay cut to come to us, the 4th richest club in the universe, somehow doesnt seem right. says a lot about why Arteta`s head was in the right place and our finances are not.

---

4th richest club = we play in a big stadium in London.

Arsenal are not cash rich.

But yeah, I agree about Arteta's head being in right place

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ollie the optimist

he wants 10k more because it was a clause in his contract when he signed that if we got CL football this year he gets a pay rise and tbh he deserves it. one of best and key players last year. as with any job, you do well you get rewarded

---

if this is true, then its already sorted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mastermind84

so you decide to screw over a play who took less money and WANTED to join us and WANTS to be here and was a very important part of our team this season?

Think about that for a second. Now if you truely feel that way then you have absolutely no right to shit on a player who plays games in wanting to leave us because you want to screw players who want to be here and are vital for us.

---

Not screwing him over at all, he signed a 4 year deal at an agreed amount per week, why should he get a new contract and a pay rise at this stage, I don't think he was outstanding, he isn't a top talent who's value is going to go up and he's only just signed a contract a year ago, if he wasn't happy with the money then he shouldn't have signed.

From what I can see we've won nothing so I don't see why we should be handing out pay rises to players under long term contracts at the age of 30.

As for players wanting to leave, if they've proved themselves to be top talents and are looking for success fair enough I've got no problem with that, we can't give them that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ItsMe

Not screwing him over at all, he signed a 4 year deal at an agreed amount per week, why should he get a new contract and a pay rise at this stage, I don't think he was outstanding, he isn't a top talent who's value is going to go up and he's only just signed a contract a year ago, if he wasn't happy with the money then he shouldn't have signed.

From what I can see we've won nothing so I don't see why we should be handing out pay rises to players under long term contracts at the age of 30.

As for players wanting to leave, if they've proved themselves to be top talents and are looking for success fair enough I've got no problem with that, we can't give them that.

---

I have mixed feelings about this, but our record with him out of the side was easily relegation standard.

The only match we won without him was away at West Brom. And if I ever hear an allegation that their keeper has taken a bribe, he'd better hope I'm not on the jury.

Liverpool in for Sigurdsson, unsurprisingly.

Bit harsh on Swansleaona to lose their manager and potentially their record signing to them. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marc Overmars

Liverpool in for Sigurdsson, unsurprisingly.

Bit harsh on Swansleaona to lose their manager and potentially their record signing to them. :lol:

---

Swansea also took out the 1 year contract that said he couldn't sign any of their players , a shame they doddled on him too long. He will obviously choose Liverpool , although I'm not sure they need him. Need a goal machine like Giroud :lol: