he'll be a central striker for us, taking rvps place with podol's out wide
if we want better quality in the squad, then some players will have to be patient (should rvp stay) - which is normal for a team at the top end of the table.
Printable View
he'll be a central striker for us, taking rvps place with podol's out wide
if we want better quality in the squad, then some players will have to be patient (should rvp stay) - which is normal for a team at the top end of the table.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...d-7844956.htmlQuote:
That means Wenger has bargaining power and will offer less than the release clause of £12.8m for the player, although Girard is unsure as to whether he can entice the Moroccan: "We would like Chamakh on loan, as part of the Giroud deal, but I don't know if it is possible."
:pray:
So we'll need to change our game entirely to accommodate him. More direct style of play, more crosses, less of the tippy-tappy, a higher tempo. Or else what's the point? We've had this sort of player in Bendtner for ages and never found a way to utilise him. If RvP is staying I guess he'll be asked to relinquish the role in which he performed so well and go wide again. Can't see it happening. This guy looks more like a replacement for RvP than anything else. And a inferior one at that. Will he leave a championship winning side to sit on the bench?Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Tuffnutz
All that said, so much can happen. If RvP is going to string out his negotiations to the last day then getting a replacement in makes sense but it also makes it more tempting to sell. If RvP can't pull off another season uninjured then this guy would be useful cover. Just goes to show how hard it is to put a team together these days with all the greedy agents and moneybags clubs out there doing their best to destabilise the game.
If we don't find a way to push Chamakh out the door then some **** should literally be shot all of a sudden. The fact a club wants him is miraculous, for us to blow this would be scandalous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss
Mvila and Drago to go.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
I don't think that's possible tbf, they can have him permanently though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe
I concur.
Since when has that stopped Wenger?Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
He's probably a new Centre Back.
Verms injured, Kos injured, Djourou injured, Miguel injured, Squalicci shit.....
....Don't forget that we also have Giroud who can play there.
not so sure we'd have to - having a quick glance at that you tube clip you can see most of his goals came on the deck. wenger rarely buys a player that has little or no technical ability. he would leave a small french team to join a much bigger club, why not? with only rvp ahead of him, games in the first team are pretty nailed on. it's not so hard to keep a team together provided players can see you are doing all you can to win something - which we're not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn