I agree we don't know and we do pay suckage wages to dross but so do other clubs we just don't here about it this much. Maybe because were not their fans and don't care.
Printable View
well thats a completely different debate that can fill 100 pages on the forum.
of course the board are also at fault but do you honestly expect anything less from the current pile of draconian ****s?
its more wenger i think. how can a man so (seemingly) intelligent be so ignorant to borderline stupidity?
which is why i think another manager should come in. no-one on this planet would be silly enough to stick by some of the players like wenger has and pay the wages ew do.
true but getting rid of dead wood can be difficult, i mean who will buy bentner? sunderland dont want him apparently, we cant just get rid of them either cos of contract issues. yes wenger fault that but a new man cant just come in and get rid off the shit.
He shouldn't be on £50k already. This is his first season as a first team player and he's already on £50k. That's just silly. He hasn't earned that. It's not just Ramsey, it's the policy in general. If Wenger sees you as a first team starter, he'll automatically give you first team wages. It's bloody stupid because if he turns out to be a flop as seen with Alumunia, Denilson, Diaby and Bendy, we can't sell them on. The 4 players I just mentioned equates to around £200k in wages and people say we can't afford to pay superstar money to one player. Rubbish. But they're right if we stick with this bloody policy. This communist regime Wenger is trying to replicate, we'd have to pay all of our star players £200k a week because it sets a precedent and we'd never survive.
Im sure we can flog him to benfica for 4 mill, Vela can stay where is he for 5 Mill, Denilson can go to a Spanish or Italian club for 7 mill.
Rosciky ,Almunia and fabianski are all on free tranfers in the summer so they they go who cares.
we can free up a lot of space this summer.
true.
and thats my other point, how the fuck have we got ourselves in this situation? we've created a pile of underachieving, unsaleable assets (and i use the term assets very loosely).
what is that? its poor management.
what should happen? he should be sacked.
what will happen? he'll stay.
why? because the board are incompetent.