How much of Tottenham do you watch on your streams, Charlie? How many Spurs game do you watch to be able to draw such a conclusion? Not just highlights of the goals where a move works out....full 90 minutes?
Printable View
It is indeed but im watching Titanic and its a long ass film so it helps the time go by.
Reminds me of last season when Theo scored 2 v Spuds and yet most on here concentrated on the couple of minutes he had where he had a shocker in the first half :lol:
When it comes to Theo, none of them really have a leg to stand on. Why do you think the topic about Theo bashing has gone from what he used to do on the pitch to his contract shit now? Cos they know they cant really bash him for what he does on it so need another excuse.
Its a WUM thing. I know cos i do it with other players and as im the best WUM in the world at what i do, i can respect it
Even with the contract thing, they have to resort to making things up though :lol:
Its embarrassing for them but funny as fuck for the rest of us normal posters
Do you think Theo should be CF? Do you think he is fit to play as CF in our current system? NQ might say he is shit but most of
fans would disagree. Theo is decent, but I will not play him as CF or build the team around him. Does Theo also deserved big money contract? I don't think so. :coffee:
You're answering my post without reading it? And then claiming I'm blinkered? Seriously?
And it's not really valid to compare Ian Wright with Theo Walcott, is it? One was a record scoring striker, the other is a player who is still trying to string more than a couple of decent performances together. Sorry but there was no dispute over Wright, Henry, Bergkamp, etc and in today's team who's going to say Arteta or Cazorla should not play? Quality players are easy to spot. We can keep going on excusing Theo for his hot and cold career or we can say he's a project that didn't bear fruit. That'll fall to the opinion of the observer but when you look at the player on the pitch it's hard not to reach certain conclusions. And even that's not the point. Point is the poor sod thinks he's a world beater and deserves 100K a week. That's just silly. We should sell him for what we can get (which is less now the disloyal **** has only signed for a year - thanks Theo) and spend the money on a talent that has matured and would be worth the £100K.
And why didn't Theo sign for 5 years and go on a big fee? Our board would hardly stand in the way of a deal like that. Maybe it's because Theo knows the truth too.
Not sure 6 years or however long it has been is "picky", Theo is well past his delivery date. He was an absolute embarrassment for England last time out - I was cringing in his behalf. And he was crap the time before that and great the time before that. And that's Theo in a nutshell, shit, shit, great, shit, shit, great. No to 100K. Make it great, great, great and then he can have 200K.