Take your own advice. No need for the not so subtle shots.
Printable View
Nothing remotely official yet mate. We might be cracking a few open or wanting to burn the site down within a week....
Pellegrini also said the same thing as Arsene today. wonder if certain people will have a go at him too?
doubt it :coffee:
I must have missed all this nonsense with Wenger and Mouron this week? It's amazing how much you don't care when you're not following the soap opera in the press or on TV...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25863298
what exactly has Arsene said wrong here? he doenst have a dig at chelsea, he says they can do what they want, its in the rules but that the rules (key word there, rules.) could be adapted. he isn't having a go at chelsea, he isn't having a go at mourinho, he is having a go at the rules. its fuck all to do with chelsea/mourinho yet mourinho makes it about him, and certain people support him in attacking the manager of the club they claim to support. its pathetic
Can't believe our lot on GW are backing Mourinho on this :doh:
kind of sounds to me as if he mentions chelsea/mata there.Quote:
“I think Juan Mata is a very good player. It is a shame he didn’t play often this year at Chelsea. I think United buy a very good player.
"Personally I don’t agree that the player can go from one team to another team in the same league at this part of the year but rules are rules and he can change clubs.
but who would have guessed, he's the manager of city right now, a team you continually praise. supporting them and mourinho and having a go at wenger.
do you get any joy in being an Arsenal fan at all? in fact, why do you fucking bother? all you do is moan, take pot shots at our club, praise to high heavens city and chelsea.
Everything said there is 100% reasonable and 100% correct. He was asked about a football story and he replied.Quote:
"I am surprised by the move because Juan Mata is a great player and they sell a great player to a direct opponent. But it opens a little bit the opportunity of this transfer market because Chelsea have already played twice against Manchester United so they don’t play again any more. They could have sold him last week. Some teams have already played twice against one opponent and some not. I think if you want to respect the fairness for everybody that should not happen."
"I can understand completely what Chelsea is doing. They do not make the rules but maybe the rules should be adapted for more fairness. They have done nothing wrong, they just play with the rules. Maybe the transfer window should stop when everybody has played once. "I think it’s a financial reason, too... That is the first time I have come to that conclusion with Chelsea. It means somewhere that Chelsea has changed philosophy and they want to get in line with Financial Fair Play. That is the main reason, that is a good thing."
The press then spin it, in the case of the Daily Saddam Hussein... "Wenger accuses Chelsea of selling secret weapon Mata to dent rivals' title chances"
He accused nobody.
Then Maureen had his tantrum and that's the story so far.
That's all this 'story' is. It's Mourinho throwing a hissy fit for no reason at all. Again.
Your link, from the Daily Pol Pot...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...er-United.html
Again no link :yawn:
But if this is true it's much more diplomatic than plainly saying it's unfair, this team could have sold him last week, they've already played them twice etc.
What's it to you? You're so biased that all you can do is throw insults at people when they don't agree, some people are very bitter in this place.
Arsenal fans chanting, "Fuck off Mourinho" on BT sport. :haha::haha:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co....should-6560382
so he says the same thing as Arsene does yet you allow pellegrini off the hook and hammer Arsene.
surprise surprise
Here's the full quotes, because some muppets like to cherry pick quotes to suit their bias.
Quote:
United are getting a very good player, but personally I do not agree that a transfer like this can happen in the middle of the season,’ he said. ‘I do not think a player should be allowed to go from one club to another in the same league in January.
It is not correct at this stage of the season. Maybe Arsene Wenger had a correct reason, when he pointed out Chelsea have already played United home and away, but my argument is a more general one.
'I just feel that if a player has made more than five or six appearances for his club, then he cannot join another one in the same league at the midway point.
‘I just think if a player plays for a club for more than half of the season, a club with money can take the best players from the other teams.
'The rules are the rules, so you play by them, but I just think they should change. I am not saying scrap the January window, just change it.
‘I don’t particularly think Chelsea will gain an advantage from this. Maybe Manchester United have an advantage because Chelsea wanted to sell him.
'Maybe United have an advantage in this case. I am talking about general reasons and not the specific reason that they have played already against them. I think in this transfer window, players that play more than five or six games for the same club cannot change to another.
‘I do think Mata is a very good player. It is a shame he didn’t play often this year at Chelsea. That was strange, but I think United buy a very good player.’
so its gone from Pellegrini never mentioned chelsea/mata/mourinho so wenger started it, what a cunt
to
well pellegrini did mention it but didn't use words like unfair, wenger started it, what a cunt.
serioulsy, you are pathetic in the length you go to excuse the behaviour of one person while hammering wenger for the exact same things you are excusing someone else of