What now for Walcott?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn

Not sure 6 years or however long it has been is "picky", Theo is well past his delivery date. He was an absolute embarrassment for England last time out - I was cringing in his behalf. And he was crap the time before that and great the time before that. And that's Theo in a nutshell, shit, shit, great, shit, shit, great. No to 100K. Make it great, great, great and then he can have 200K.

---

Pretty much, but because he has one good game at the Euro's he is suddenly world class :lol:

Was interesting watching Podolski line up for that FK yesterday, for once I believed it might go in. When Walcott gets the ball I flip channels to see if anything decent is on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ach

So hes not allowed a bad game then ever?

NQ logic :bow:

---

He doesn't no shit about football. It's just as plain as that. I'm done talking and just dismissing. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn

You're answering my post without reading it? And then claiming I'm blinkered? Seriously?

And it's not really valid to compare Ian Wright with Theo Walcott, is it? One was a record scoring striker, the other is a player who is still trying to string more than a couple of decent performances together. Sorry but there was no dispute over Wright, Henry, Bergkamp, etc and in today's team who's going to say Arteta or Cazorla should not play? Quality players are easy to spot. We can keep going on excusing Theo for his hot and cold career or we can say he's a project that didn't bear fruit. That'll fall to the opinion of the observer but when you look at the player on the pitch it's hard not to reach certain conclusions. And even that's not the point. Point is the poor sod thinks he's a world beater and deserves 100K a week. That's just silly. We should sell him for what we can get (which is less now the disloyal **** has only signed for a year - thanks Theo) and spend the money on a talent that has matured and would be worth the £100K.

And why didn't Theo sign for 5 years and go on a big fee? Our board would hardly stand in the way of a deal like that. Maybe it's because Theo knows the truth too.

---

:bow: NQ

Quote:

---

Point is the poor sod thinks he's a world beater and deserves 100K a week. That's just silly. We should sell him for what we can get (which is less now the disloyal **** has only signed for a year - thanks Theo) and spend the money on a talent that has matured and would be worth the £100K.

---

:gp:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner

Seen them lots On sky sports when there on and under harry their movement was quite fast etc.

---

Talking about Bale, Valencia, Nani, Lennon, Milner etc, I think most will fail under Wenger.. maybe Nani and Bale (if Wenger doesn't move him to LB) will make it but the rest will not make it at Arsenal. Wenger never likes these type of players. :coffee:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn

Was interesting watching Podolski line up for that FK yesterday, for once I believed it might go in. When Walcott gets the ball I flip channels to see if anything decent is on.

---

Problem with Theo he has lived off that hatrick against croatia, so people like ach get brainwashed into thinking he is world class. :haha:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner

Pretty much, but because he has one good game at the Euro's he is suddenly world class :lol:

---

I'm ambivalent about Theo - don't care if he stays or goes, but I thought he was one of the very few England players to have a good tournament.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by milla

Talking about Bale, Valencia, Nani, Lennon, Milner etc, I think most will fail under Wenger.. maybe Nani and Bale (if Wenger doesn't move him to LB) will make it but the rest will not make it at Arsenal. Wenger never likes these type of players. :coffee:

---

Never said they would not.

You lot really abused the word "brainwash" lol. :coffee:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GB.

I'm ambivalent about Theo - don't care if he stays or goes, but I thought he was one of the very few England players to have a good tournament.

---

From what i saw his best game was against Ukraine, fair enough but other then that don't think he was that good. Not his fault the team was shite though.