Printable View
That's a silly comparison. Wilshere has only had one season in the first team and since he's sat this season out there has been no media attention on him. We don't know how he'd handle the fame. Plus, if your talking about off the pitch stuff, you sure Wilshere is the guy you want to hold up as the kid heading in the right direction?Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Walcott was supposed to be the next great thing, he's failed to deliver anywhere near what has been expected of him. Wilshere has breezed past him, both for Arsenal and England. Nobody talks about Theo as if he is anything special any more, whereas Wilshere is viewed as the future. What Walcott was supposed to achieve, Wilshere has done in record time. Wilshere may have had a few off-field issues but nothing detrimental to his football, with that he's gone from strength to strength. Walcott, on the other hand, has been busy telling Wenger and Capello how it should be. He's as dumb off the pitch as on it in football terms. We may get lucky and he'll wise up and start performing, but so far no sign of that. He doesn't seem to have any competition for his place and I'm wondering why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
Record time? What is that exactly? What has he achieved? The hype level?Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Wilshere is hype? Don't think so. Walcott, on the other hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
I'm not hyping Wilshere up or nuffin but he is one of the best midfielders in the world. #c.f.arsenalvbarcelona
Ollie is not gay :sulk:Quote:
Originally Posted by Syntos Claus
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
Good start by Fulham.
Hope it is short lived.
Thanks Riise.
In the transfer market?Quote:
Originally Posted by GB.