Doesn't the fact Chamakh being 47 million times better and a more than than decent enough replacement for RVP as proven last season come in to it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Wilshere
Printable View
Doesn't the fact Chamakh being 47 million times better and a more than than decent enough replacement for RVP as proven last season come in to it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Wilshere
WUM, as you know very well - Chamakh is shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ach
F*ck me, it's looks like we're going to lose 2 of our best players and we get linked with a shower of sh*t. :(
I don't care who we're 'linked with'.Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe
I do!Quote:
Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL)
I'm so angry I could punch a polar bear :angry:
:haha: Now we know why Stu Francis never used that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
Well in all likelyness those are the players we'll end up signing if any, we won't be signing someone they don't find out about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL)
Plus the "cheap" aspect of these players stinks of Wenger.
I'll care if and when we sign any of them.
What sort of an attitude is that FFS?Quote:
Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL)
Raging at every link on goal.com and tribalfootball is the way to go.
Nasri to United it seems from an ITK