For whatever reason, blacks are allowed to use that word. Whites aren't. But why somebody wants to associate Ozil with it I don't know. Probably Neil Ashton, who is a prime example of "that" other word.Quote:
Originally Posted by hobson's choice
Printable View
For whatever reason, blacks are allowed to use that word. Whites aren't. But why somebody wants to associate Ozil with it I don't know. Probably Neil Ashton, who is a prime example of "that" other word.Quote:
Originally Posted by hobson's choice
Ozil ^^ :haha:
Hernandez to Marketing.
It's all happening. Elsewhere.
If we're 'very active' what would that make other teams?Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Diame to Hull:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29016533
Snubbed again!
Wenger :doh:.
No where has the term Marketing been more appropriate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
To be honest as previously stated my opinion of Giroud is so low that it makes no difference to me whether he is fit or not, that's why i'm not in hysterics about replacing him because we are blunt up top even with him there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
I still think Sanchez is the answer but not as long as we keep playing this slow turgid game in which we need a striker to hold up the ball rather than running off the last defender.
Defender/Defensive Midfielder is required whatever system/style of play we adopt.
To be fair Wenger isn't lying, he says he'd be very active on transfer deadline dayQuote:
Originally Posted by Munchies
He didn't actually say what he'd be very active doing...i'd say flying to Rome to manage a team for charity is Very Active.
can we start a sweepstake over who on this board is going to top themselves?
Seriously...i'd love that
I will only kill myself if Wellbeck comes
:haha: :haha:Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG