And that he wasn't allowed to sign the players he wants.
Printable View
And that he wasn't allowed to sign the players he wants.
He must have noted how successful it was last season.
I agree with everything you say. No way should RVP go to Citeh. It not only strengthens a direct rival, but it says to players that we might not be able to prevent them leaving, but we will damn well decide their destinantion if there is any power for us to do so. RVP is gone - if he wants out for trophies, then he can fuck off to Italy...or he can hand in a transfer request and lose a shed load of money...or rot in the reserves for his final year, therefore lowering his value. There is pressure that the club can bring to bear on this one.
And I was only thinking last night that we should bid for Demba Ba. A Wenger type player if ever there was one, and the fact that Pardew is even considering taking Carroll back speaks volumes about what Ba has said to him.
i would much prefer rvp to go to city for two reasons - firstly he would either not be playing every week in his preferred position or would have to play on a rotational basis.
secondly, city are not rivals or direct competitors.
RVP playing out of position hardly makes them significantly stronger plus his lack of progression would be funny.
and let's not kid ourselves, man city can and will pick up our best players whenever they want.
city will stay above us for quite some time, so let's worry about the spurs and liverpools of the world.
I'll say the same as I did when they bought Nasri last year. If RvP goes, we lose a good striker. If he does not go to Citeh, they will just buy a different good striker. Either way, Citeh get a good striker, we lose one. From our perspective, it doesn't matter which way.
I could ask that, but I'm not writing War and bloody Peace.
The point of that paragraph was this: companies don't like their employees talking publically in a negative way.
Choosing to step publically out of line like this is sybolic, a signal of intent that he is no longer unwilling to adhere to the contraints of his contract or it's code of conduct.
If you want to condemn or condone the club's handling of this situation and it's own conduct, go right ahead.
I haven't touched on that at all.
http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...94442720_n.jpg
Spot how many players won't be with us this season!
Well, that's bender in the background with his head turned. RVP and Arshavin. All gone.
Gibbs and Song to stay. I'm assuming that's Vermaelen bending ready to receive from RVP...and there's a pair of legs I can't has at a guess, without being a bit John Terry.
RVP really needs to get the 'Just for Men' in before his contract talks with Gaz and Wenger. He knows how they feel about players ageing.
:whacky:
wishful thinking #1: RVP signs a new contract.
wishful thinking #2: We sell RVP to Citeh and get Dzeko.
:haha:
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/...fenerbahce-one
RVP to Fenerbahce
http://www1.skysports.com/football/n...ve-RVP-offers-
Wenger may owe a journalist a chocolate bar if RVP moves to Juve. It is an inferior league, but maybe the slower pace will suite RVP and prolong his career?Quote:
Sky Sports understands Arsenal have received a number of offers for captain Robin van Persie following his decision not to extend his stay with the club.
The Holland international confirmed earlier this month that he would not sign fresh terms at Emirates Stadium, with his current contract having just 12 months left to run.
The Gunners have been left in the unenviable position of having to cash in on Van Persie this summer, or allow their star striker to walk away for nothing at the end of the season.
Manchester City, Manchester United and Juventus have all been strongly linked with the former Feyenoord player, who made the move to North London in May 2004.
Concerns
Van Persie topped the Premier League scoring charts last term, netting an impressive 30 times as he helped Arsene Wenger's side finish third in the table.
The Dutchman returned to training on Monday for further discussions with Wenger and chief executive Ivan Gazidis having previously outlined his concerns over the club's future direction.
The 28-year-old fears that the club will not be able to challenge for major honours if they continue to adopt the transfer policy and wage structure of recent years following their move to the Emirates.
It now remains to be seen how Arsenal respond to the offers they have received for a player who already has a number of suitors vying for his services.
Who cares.
Juve would be the best option for us if he dont wanna stay.
Just fuck him off asap if thats the case.
Bored of it all now.
Maybe you should avoid this thread.
Why?
I dont give a fuck about RVP, I support Arsenal not 1 player.
If he dont want to stay then I have no obligation to worry about the possibility of him prolonging his career.
I think he meant, if you're bored of it, you should avoid this thread.
:shrug:
In any case. I agree, get this thing done and kick the **** out of the door.
Yeh fair enough.
Apparently we've told the **** he's not leaving this summer.
Expect him to be sold on Aug 31st for £5m
for once im pleased with that. why should this **** dictate to us what he wants and what he will do.
:popcorn:
Get a new phone Syn FFS.
If he is to be staying fir the remainder of his contract we will be dealing with untold speculation right up until the transfer window closes.
I say get rid, take whatever Juve are offering this time and bring in another. . .
to be fair I am quite excited to see how we shape up and who we bring in. . .sure a fit (that is the key) RvP who wants to play for us (another key) would be awesome to see with the new guys. . , but why suffer a season of knowing he is off come season end. . ,saying that I doubt whether the interest in him will ever be as high
If he stays, I can see his broken ass getting injured by September
Is that a threat?
Yes it is!
You're going to injure his ass?
:sick:
He's going to get literally raped there.
Twitter blowing up with a rumour that Rvp has signed a 2 year deal @ the Emirates