If the c*nt doesnt sign a new contract by the end of the month, send him to the reserves. Fuck him and bitches like him... we have fat fuck for cover! :pray:
Printable View
If the c*nt doesnt sign a new contract by the end of the month, send him to the reserves. Fuck him and bitches like him... we have fat fuck for cover! :pray:
Why do I need to sign a contract. And wtf is it to do with you?Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
I meant to edit the bit about cover out of fy's post. But I lacked that little bit of sharpness. I should indeed be relegated to the reserves.
So it is off to Goonersworld for me.
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Funny story this, Wenger thinks that if he hasn't signed by April it will be hard to give him a new contract. I would have thought that if he hasn't decided to leave already he would have by January and will already be looking to sign a pre-contract agreement by then.
Wenger is so deluded, reminds me of the Flamini situation where he was convinced Flamini would sign all season and Flamini kicked dust in his face and said thanks for the memories but I'm off to Milan :lol:
[QUOTE]Arsene Wenger hints at Theo Walcott deal deadline
Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has warned it will be "difficult" to extend Theo Walcott's contract if the forward has not agreed a new deal by April.
Walcott is in the final year of his contract and rejected a new five-year deal worth £75,000 a week in August.
"If in April it is not done, you can think it will be difficult to do," said Wenger of further planned negotiations.
Wenger also suggested that he may be reluctant to select the 23-year-old if an agreement is not reached.
Walcott has started only one game so far this season - the club's opening Premier League match against Sunderland - and received a mixed reception from the home fans when he was introduced as a substitute against former club Southampton at Emirates Stadium.
Theo Walcott's Arsenal career
Wenger insisted that the England international's place on the bench was not a consequence of his failure to agree new terms, but admitted that it may come into consideration if the matter remains unresolved.
"I still hope to extend his contract so, at the moment, it doesn't affect me. Of course at some stage..." the Frenchman added ahead of his side's opening Champions League match against Montpellier on Tuesday.
"You want your players to be supported no matter what kind of contractual situation they are in. I hope it will not affect him and that it will not affect our fans."
Walcott, who joined Arsenal in a deal worth about £12.5m ar a 16-year-old in January 2006,"could sign a pre-contract agreeMent with another club il January. By the end of`the seawon, he will be 24 and entitled to move as a free agent at the end of his contrabt.
Arsenal sold striker Robin van Persie to Manchester United for £24m in August after the Dutchman ajnounced that he would not extend his contract which, like Walcott's, was due to expire in June 2013.
Twelve months previously, Arsenal sold Samir Nasri to Manchester City, a year before the end of his own contract, after the French international
Yeah he was one of those oNe season wonders, not apsurprise he's disappeared off tle face of the planet since his move, never really had much goinf for him, much like Pleb.Quote:
Originally Posted by NDG
Take heed of what exactly? His own fans don't rate him, same goes for the pundits, he's been forever tagged with this 'he lacks a footballing brain' catchphrase and the 'he hasn't developed' headline. It's different to the Flamini situation. I change of scene may do his career good.Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
Well, I'm assuming he's holding out for more money?Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
And it would appear that we have offered him a deal, which he has turned down?
I'm saying that he's not as good as he thinks he is, and that on some occassions (I'm not talking about our best players, Cesc, Henry RVC etc) the grass is not always greener. As Flamini found.
Flamini :haha:
Money is a factor but I don't think that's the issue and I don't think he's arrogant enough to think he's that good either. If you were in his shoes, what's the appeal of Arsenal and why stay here? That's a question for all in fact. Why should he sign a new contract? What's in it for him?Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
I do rate Walcott and think he is (not could be, is) an effective player but realistically I don't think he could do any better than Arsenal. I get the whole self-loathing 'we are shit' thing but when all is said and done, we are a top 8 club in Europe. He won't get more games at the above 7 teams.
I can't comment. I'm a gooner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
I'd play for Arsenal for £20k per year.