Printable View
Bendtner won't come back anyway, he wants out. Plus he'll miss the train back to London the first 50 times even if he does try to sneak back. Chamakh could keep his head down and try to stay though. Somehow he's managed to get onto the payroll of a football team and it might not be so easy trying to get him out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ach
He has earnt it tbh..Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
He earned it by winning the Best Haircut award.Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
Agreed - two experienced squad players for a minimal fee would be excellent business - let's see if it works out. Am guessing Demspey would cost around 5-6million especially as he's pretty much said he'd only move to a champions league club.
Am still hoping we gazump spurs in their bid for Vertonghen and add M'Villa (if all the hype around him is true) And Kagawa looks like a ready made replacement for Rosicky so he'd also be an excellent addition - plus Dortmund seem to want Bendtner so reckon we could do a deal there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebus
Haven't read through the entire thread and haven't been on here for a while BUT here's my OUTS and INs for next season...and am hoping for a lot of movement.
OUT
Denilson - 3million
Bendtner - 6million
Vela - 9million (with 25% sell-on clause) the guy is perfect for the spanish league
Arshavin - 4million
Almunia - free
Squillacci - free
Fabianski - 500,000
Djourou - 5million
Lansbury - 4million (with a 25% sell-on clause)
Chamakh possibly? - 7million
NET Approx 35million give or take
IN
Podolski - 11million
M'Villa - 18millon
Dempsey - 6million
Kalou - free
Vertohngen - 10million
Begovic - 8million
Some kids e.g. Powell
NET spend around 50million
On the face of it Vela doesn't seem to have done too badly in Spain, 12 goals in 35 games isn't too bad. The guy always had talent, maybe just not suited to the PL though, don't think Wenger ever played him to his strengths either.
He doesn't seem to want to come back though, so maybe we can setup a deal, not sure how much for though.
I'd be shocked if anyone paid 7 million for Chamakh though, he's been a disaster since he's been here, I'm not sure there's much resale value left in him, can't see us getting 5 million for Djourour either. In fact we'd be lucky to get any money for some of those guys listed, not sure anyone will be interested in them.
We might see a lot of those outs but those ins will probably just be Podolski + 1.
Most likely, we don't tend to bring many players in, last summer was the exception of course...but one we were very much forced into. We never seem to do the necessary in the transfer market, I genuinely believe Wenger thinks he just needs to tweak the squad, in his head we're still 2% away from domination and nothing will convince him otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
Personally I think we lack a few top quality players to drive us forward.
Vela, Bendtner even Denilson....I would have preferred to have them in the team over Park, Chamakh and Ramsey. That's how rubbish they were. No idea why we signed Park, Chamakh contributed nothing and Ramsey was so awful I actually miss Denilson's sideways passing accuracy.Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe
Park was never given a chance, although he did score 1 goal and never played again, and Chamakh started off his arsenal career well, scoring 15 goals, then turned shit and disappeared.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
Ramsey is still so so tbh. But I wouldn't take any of vela, bendtner or Denilson in their place.
They are all fucking crap.
That's a joke post, right? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergkampwonderland10
someone has been playing too much football manager 2012
I kinda hope so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Guns 11
Begovic :lol:
SSN breaking news
Eden Hazard spotted outside Old Trafford in a Chelsea shirt talking to Roberto Mancini.
It's on!Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
Signed for Spuds? :coffee:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
Tomorrow is Fernando Llorente Day (allegedly).
Can't wait.
:scarf:
Press conference at 7pm
You are wrong in your calculation my friend. Our net from transfers out is 21 million. You forget that the 7 million for Chakma is something we'd have to give another club to take him from us..Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergkampwonderland10
I'd be fairly confident of finishing in the top 2 and winning something if we did make all those in's/outs , along with Wilshere returning. But its never going to happen :(
unlikely i know, but given we have podolski already, if we were to sign giroud and llorente and it meant rvp left would you accept that?
also if we are to sign giroud, that owuld be the way to get rid of chamkh. apparently we are offering him to montieplier as player exchange deal
I'd rather keep RVP to be fair, proven in the prem and world class. But there is also the risk of him being injury prone , last season was probably the first in 8 years where he was fit . So I'm not too sure, but if he were to leave I'd rather have LLorente/Giroud then Park/Chamakh up front.Quote:
Originally Posted by ollie the optimist
i agree, it's not like vela/denilson are miles better and would have contributed anything extraordinary over the season compared to the others. it would be silly to suggest they would be preferred to chamakh or ramsey, because at least the latter have good work rate. admittedly they aren't the most talented and in the case of ramsey, he clearly has more to learn, but denilson would have been the lazy, unconventional player that he has been for the past few years with little care for tracking back or putting in tackles. at least ramsey has a bit of heart and is determined to prove himself in the team by covering ground and putting in more effort. on top of that ramsey has room for improvement, especially after coming back from a serious injury, whilst denilson stagnated tremendously during his time here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebus
the only one i'd suggest would have been preferred was bendtner but even then, wenger wouldn't have put him up front during the season, he would have probably put him on the wing like he has done previously which is a waste of talent and offers nothing more than what benayoun offered. in which case the comparisons aren't credible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergkampwonderland10
http://redgunners.files.wordpress.co...gersmiling.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Arsene Wenger
Hazard signing for Chelsea. Well, the "Champions League winner".
Thank fuck that's over.
phewww it's fuckin over
Mata and Hazard in the same team?
Lampard :rose:
Hazard is such a moneygrabber, signing for Chelsea when Man City would have paid him more....footballers these days :rolleyes:
"I am signing for the champions league winner"
:lol:
Whata****
:goodpost:Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe
Is bringing football back to how it should be. Trophies and not money
Hazard :bow:
The Old Boys getting phased out. :rose:
yes of course, chelsea are famous for not giving players ridiclous wages at all. if whats being reported is true, then half a million a month is nothing. who the fuck can survive on that these days? he will have to get benefits as well to help with living costs cos the poor man is only on half a million a fucking month. jesus christ you talk utter bullshit at timesQuote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe
that could mean anything though. united have won it as well :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Guns 11
wouldnt be shocked if it wasnt chelsea
He's on 100k a week after tax. :lol:
Not money grabbing at all turning down united who have the best manager in the league. Hell, who the fuck is managing chelsea next season anyway?
Hazard chose the easy option. A club with no competition for places with someone one dumb enough to give a 22(?) Year old £10mill a year for 5 years.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
thank god its over, it was starting to become more annoying than the never-ending DFS sale
No not really, Chelsea have proved their ambitious and need to replace some players, it makes perfect sense for him to choose them....in addition most people want to live in London or thereabouts.Quote:
Originally Posted by ollie the optimist
He's proved he's interested in football.
http://thebusbyway.com/wp-content/up...YCMAAK3N5.jpeg
What a dick. :lol:
Easy option?Quote:
Originally Posted by AKBapologist
He joined a team that finished 6th in the league. How is that easy?
Clearly Chelsea offered him more playing time and theres no problem with that. Hazard made a footballing decision and people on here who critisise Nasri should be praising Hazard for doing so
Really dumb picking a team who win stuff and have for a number of years now, who in addition need to replace players and are based in London. Why the f*ck would you want to sign for a club and sit on the bench exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by AKBapologist
Maybe he see's Chelsea as the best option for him location and career wise and who would disagree, they've just won two trophies and have been at the top of the English game for a number of years.
Great move for him and great move for Chelsea.
if he wanted football its united its as simple as that. he wanted money, city and chelsea were only going to offer him that, chelsea offered more. if he was interested in football, why would he whore himself out as he did, look at maccys post, and why demand such high wages?Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMe