We all knew OX and park would be CC and Fa cup/ bit part league players anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Printable View
We all knew OX and park would be CC and Fa cup/ bit part league players anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Sky's programme starts in a few minutes.
Not sure what makes Chamakh more deserving of a place on the bench though. Utterly pointless option to have there, the sooner he fucks off the better, so Park/Ox at least have the chance to change a game if called upon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner
Ju :haha:.
His Lille betrayal was ill-advised.
Well this is the part of the season where the 'bit part' players are needed. In the last few games we have seen very, very sluggish performances. I have no problem in starting our best choice line-up if they are ready to go and able to put in a good shift. If we see a lethargic performance it'll be very frustrating knowing that we needed some changes. I know our squad depth isn't the best but these are the games Park and Oxlade were supposed to play IMO. Lets hope fears of tiredness are unfounded or, at least, as Maccy says, Fulham are more tired than our guys.Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner
Nonsense, what about Chamakh? He always changes the game when he comes on, even if it's just by reducing us to 10 men.Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander
really worried about the strength of our bench. I mean, apart from (maybe, a little bit) Arsh, they are all pretty crap. Having OX and Park in there would be much better option. Why bother with Cham, he has been cack for 12+ months, and is buggering off shortly too. Sometimes I wonder I Wenger knows what he is doing.
Le Tiss is co-commentating. :bow:
Foolish of me, sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
He must be due a goal, even off his arse or something.
Any reason why Henry wasnt included for this?
Have we actually got him yet?