Rubbish.
He prays on girls off of Facebook and lusts after their smutty photos.
Printable View
He is pretty religious.
Yes.
He religiously lusts after their smutty photos.
Not really wanting to kick this up again but people say Wenger is the root of all evil but what if. . .
Usmanov took control and gave AW a war chest to get the job done, with the instructions to spend the money, he would, in the same way the current board are promoting prudence in order to enhance their pay days. . .which is what he does.
Now we want a manager that fight his corner for the good of the team, at times demand action etc but surely Wenger is only acting like a lot of us do day in day out and that is follwing his job spec and doing what he is told
I know there is a lot to read between the lines but. . .
Wenger did the same at Monaco. He looks for value in the transfer market. That's one of his traits. Also, if you look at the wage bill and the quality we have in the squad, the money is there but it's being fluttered away on junk. This is pretty simple. We spent £10m on Poldoski and £13m on Giroud. Combine their wages and that's at least over £100k a week. Instead of buying 2 decent players, why not spend £20m on a world class player? It's a mismanagemt of funds IMO. Why pay 3 average players £50k a week when you can pay a £150k to a star player?
The Board don't tell Wenger who he can buy. Also, Wenger's opinion is held in such high esteem, if he wanted to break the bank or break the wage structure, I'm pretty sure they'd listen to him. They did when it came to the youth academy, training ground, emirates stadium, even down to the way the pitch is watered and the design of the changing rooms.
He's a stubborn man and if you listen to what he said about Pep and not being brave enough to stick to your convictions and philosophy of how football should be played, you start to get the picture of why we're still persisting with a failed system.
Red and White's statement is nothing more than a shameless piece of opportunism. If Usmanov truly had the best interests of the club at heart, he would not have sanctioned this. As it is, it merely deepens the crisis sparked by the inevitable departure of another mercenary opportunist.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...lisher-usmanov
Hill-Wood reply to Usmanov