Nah I don't think Fed will have much problem with any of the remaining guys on his side, except for Djokovic of course. Berdych and Tsonga for one reason or another aren't an issue like the last two times.
Printable View
Nah I don't think Fed will have much problem with any of the remaining guys on his side, except for Djokovic of course. Berdych and Tsonga for one reason or another aren't an issue like the last two times.
Murrays got Baghtadis next. Decent player but not as good as he once was so should win that
Probably Cilic in the 4th round. Cant see Murray kicking a line judge to let Cilic through so another win
Ferrer in the quarters will be tricky but on grass, Murray is better. Might be Del Potro but hes fitness is an issue
Tsonga in the semis, anyones game
Djokovic/Federer in the final, Comefortable 3 setter
Murrays doing this
Tsonga vs Goffin could be brilliant (if they face) and no idea who would win it. Can't see Fish sustaining a run.
Whos this Goffin dude? :blink:
Played really well at Roland Garros, gave Federer a hell of a match (for a bit). Wildcard for Wimbledon, Lucky Loser for the French Open.
He is a mini-Federer.
Didnt watch any of Federers matches bar the semi final so didnt see him at Roland Garros.
Il keep an eye out during Wimbledon
Henmans viewQuote:
Ivo Karlovic questioned the integrity of Wimbledon after he was foot-faulted 11 times in his second-round defeat by Britain's Andy Murray.
The Croat, who lost 7-5 6-7 6-2 7-6, accused officials of favouring the home player and said he felt "cheated".
"It was outrageous, outrageous," he said. "It's Wimbledon, Centre Court, and they do this. The whole credibility of this tournament went down for me."
"That's very tough to question the integrity of Wimbledon," said Murray.
"It's got a lot of history, a lot of tradition. There's been hundreds of thousands of matches played here over the years. I've never heard that before.
"But I need to see the videos. If there was 11 foot faults called against him and every one was incorrect, then that's completely wrong and unfair.
"But for it to happen that many times, you would think there would have been a number of fairly obvious foot faults, because you don't really see them called that much nowadays."
Karlovic claimed he could have won had it not been for the officials.
When asked what was the difference between the two players, he replied: "Foot faults. I don't know what to say, but it was a little bit outrageous.
"In my whole life, ever since I was eight years old, my whole life I didn't do this many foot faults. It was like 11.
"After I don't know how many, I stood a little bit back so they cannot call (foot fault). They still did it."
An All England Club spokesman responded to the accusations by saying: "If he wishes to make a formal complaint then all evidence will be reviewed."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/18636457Quote:
Tim Henman
Former British number one and BBC Sport commentator
"In the Davis Cup, you always feel like a few calls go against you. With a foot fault, you are implying that the line judge is cheating, because you can't judge for yourself as you're focusing on the ball. It's something he will regret saying it in the morning. You can't question the integrity of this tournament."
Dont really get the foot fault thing. One of the times he foot faulted and then the next serve, he did the same thing and that wasnt called.
McEnroe is right in saying that challenges should be allowed on foot faults
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/9731435.stm
Schedule tomorrow
Djokovic up first
Then Watson
Federer up last
On court 1, Querrys match will be played to the finish first before Sharapova comes in at 2nd.
Zvonoreva v Clijsters could be decent as well
Almagro and Gasquet close it up
Rosol playing doubles today
What a man :bow:
Raining now so play suspended before it even starts