The days of billionaires coming in to a new club and spending shitloads without first selling are gone, only the ones that already have them are going to get any benefit from them now.
Printable View
The days of billionaires coming in to a new club and spending shitloads without first selling are gone, only the ones that already have them are going to get any benefit from them now.
We hate him when hes wrong or right
With all of PHW's money, and even Kroenke too, I bet one of them could say, AS FANS, fuck it, i am going to personally volunteer funds so we can splash out on one massive world superstar to send a message. Is someone stopping them? Is the club opposed to donations?
But we are to slate players if they decide to head in the direction of more money and better odds of winning titles --- they are the greedy ones.
Hopefully this will be the case for us too:
'the Ewing theory'
http://proxy.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?id=1193711
Sound familiar in parts, non?
They don't own the whole of the club so no owner would do it anyway in those circumstances (PHW owns fuck all really) and we already know Kroenke isn't an Arsenal supporter. The only way things will change is through the additional TV money. In any case, money for transfers, wages - transfers and wages, what exactly? And for how many years to keep doing it?
Fucking horse placenta munching shit. What a freak.
Another shout to AFCamden on twitter who said yesterday that it was likely that RVP was going to united :bow:
He also says that we will see Sahin come in if rvp is confirmed as leaving.
UEFA's new rules I think only allow a relatively small amount directly from owners to 'give' to clubs, now of course you hide it behind a sponsorship deal but we know we can't do that right now. Even if he had put in I dunno what, £60 million (?), it probably wouldn't have made much difference to RVP anyway.
So the media say.
Marca said today that Jose wants him to go to pool, but Sahin himself wants to come to arsenal.
Sahin wants CL football and Jose wants to help his bum chum out and probably doesn't want one of his players helping us out in the big competition they want to win I guess.
But ultimately as Jose has already said, the final decision will come down to where the player wants to go.
you have to wonder why a player who has seen his manager and hte man who made him the player he is today called a paedo by 70k of his new clubs fans, called a rapist himself would want to play for said club.
oh wait its money. the judas money grabbing ****
You are right. The time to have stayed with the flow, when we were seen as one of the big boys, is long gone. PHW, AW and co spent most of their time criticising what their richer friends were doing -- all the while hiding behind self-sustainability.
AW: if you give me a 100mil and tell me to put it in the squad, I will give it back! I don't want to bankrupt the club.
Me: hey fucker, it's my money, take it and use it to stay competitive -- to move with the times -- rather than bang on about what rich owner fans are doing! It is about more than money.
The difference being that we seem to need to sell to buy. Our net spend is negative, which is either because the board are telling Wenger to balance the books or he has taken it upon himself to do so,all in the name of "self sustainability". Surely it wouldn't hurt to run a deficit for one transfer window? Especially given that there's surely been an accumulation of funds from previous windows that haven't been spent.
spending 35 million on three players is ok. spending 100s of millions on three players is not. operating a football club where you spend 117% of your entire turnover on wages etc is not accepatbel and no pride in wining.
all clubs need to spend money to win, however there is a difference between what we spend and city spend and why one way is much better
that's what you call a self-sustainable model my friend. if the aim is to be self-sustainable we will always try to balance the books i.e. sell to cover what we buy. the first rule of self-sustainability is to never make a deficit but if you do, minimise it as much as possible. we were always going to sell the c*nt but to united? that's ridiculous.
Anyone got him on Twitter?
You know what to do
City's owners a rich fans pumping their own money into their club. If you don't like it, fine. If your club's owner wants to run your club as a business and you are happy with that fine!
But then don't go around calling players greedy when they opt to work for the owner who will invest top bucks to ensure they win. IN FACT It is about more than money as far as these owners are concerned.
Our board members would sell their own kids for a profit. You only have to look down the road at the stance taken by Levy with Modric - the price is 40M, until then.....FUCK OFF! We sell to a direct rival at a reduced rate, the same team that fucked us in the ass 8-2... what do we do???? We make them even stronger! Fucking muppets running this club.
It's more fucking infuriating that it's happened this late into the window tbh.
If we'd have sold him straight after the euros then bought cazorla, I doubt most fans would be as pissed off as the feel right now.
I had already dealt with the fact he was leaving and probably to utd, but I wish it was done a lot sooner.
Still, we'll see someone coming in now RVP is gone.
We can feel like shit and pissed off again when song is sold next week and feel slightly better when another player comes in for him.
No,you will be the moron to assume one has to be born a fan. I wasn't born an arsenal fan -- who gives a shit? You? Who cares? And you will be a bigger moron to assume they are pumping all that money into the club to make profit. That much is obvious. They are footie fans who bought the club they could and are pumping money into the club to make it their dream club AS FANS. I don't begrudge them that.