During the match yes as it can make a difference to the game and the way a player performs, after the match though it serves no purpose all it does is create a rift.
His defence conceded 6 goals, so he's hardly faultless.
Printable View
Unfortunately we have to build a team using business methods, it's a big disadvantage compared to comedy clubs like the gypos and chavs. They just steal some more money from their citizens back home, rape and torture a few people and steal their land, etc, and then use the stolen cash to buy who they want. Although to be fair, they have business fronts in place now that make them look respectable - like Al Capone.
From what I heard Wilshere was awful, why was he not having a go at him rather than Ozil then (I haven't seen many comments about Ozil being dreadful), you also pointed out Wilshere was at fault for a goal which Ozil wasn't.
Again though don't agree with doing it after a match, during yes, after no.
Most of the Citeh attacks on the right came through Zabaleta, that was Jack's duty. You can't expect Monreal to leave a big gap between himself and our CBs, especially when Citeh's midfields were playing so narrowly. I saw the same problem with Jack against Everton, he just didn't have the nous or disciplines to play on the wing. As a result who ever is covering will be left facing 2 players on thier own, today it was Monreal. :coffee:
Yes and no, sure they have an advantage but we also have chosen to sign the players we have, we've shown by signing Ozil that if we want to we can go after top quality, we just haven't. I think it shown in big games, let's not forget we use to have a team capable of taking on anyone, it's also the type of players we sign.....where is our Yaya Toure who basically leads and runs the midfield, where our Aguero (oh yeah we sold him to Man U).
Ozil made a poor pass across the face of the goal that lead to flamini being unable to control it.
Either way, the entire midfield had a shocker.