According to that Sky report, he's more box to box and likes to attack more than Coquelin, but I'm not complaining.
But why has he been allowed to leave mid season and for such a small fee?
Printable View
According to that Sky report, he's more box to box and likes to attack more than Coquelin, but I'm not complaining.
But why has he been allowed to leave mid season and for such a small fee?
Agreed, if he is the best we are going to get then lets hope he turns out to be all we hope for. Coq was never going to get through the season without an injury or booking related layoff so we are here where we are. Let him come in and play the FA cup games. He should be good enough to come in for Flamini after 60 mins. No other player in our squad except Coq and Flamini can be descrided as a DM.
Still need a striker though.
The issue isn't so much focussed on the signing (he could be decent and I hope he is) as on the fact we pretty much always leave ourselves in this situation by not doing enough in the summer, now sure you can say let's do the best we can now, but isn't that what we do every single transfer window? What we're doing thanks to Wenger poor judgement and planning is always half dealing with issues because there's never anyone available good enough.
I was just making a point about some information being better than none, this guy is an ubknown and thus we've seen nothing of him to make an accurate judgment, so at this time all we can base it on is other people's opinions who do know a bit about him.
He's better than what we have, how can he not be as our backups are dreadfully inadequate, the issue is the lack of planning and the fact that if this guy doesn't prove to be good enough (which is entirely possible considering the level he's been playing at), we're once again stuck with a player who isn't quite up to the right level but will be around for years to come, just like the Giroud's and Flamini's of this world.
Aye, my thoughts exactly. Have done a bit of homework on him, from reading the articles he does seem quite a tidy player, looks a decent passer from those youtube clips (don't laugh) and isn't afraid to put his foot in.
Wenger has a good track record with players in the 7-10mill range so I have high hopes for him. I do think it will take him a good season to settle in though.
Basle aren't a club who have a history of inflating valuations for their players or dragging their heels to rinse as much money as they can from the selling club. They sold Shaqiri, who was one of the hottest properties in Europe at the time for only 8.4 million to Bayern.
Thing is with them being a big fish in a small pond and dominating their league the same way Celtic and Bayern do theirs, they really aren't desperate for cash.
I also suspect that other clubs who may have been sniffing around decided to withdraw their interest as soon as we, quite early, leaked news of our approach for the player. That probably helped us drive down the price by preventing a bidding war.
Some very good players have come out of Basle's first team in recent years, Shaqiri like you mentioned, Mo Salah who is doing great things in Seria A even though Chelsea pretty much discarded him, Barca's Ivan Rakitic came from Basle via Sevilla to Barca. I'm not suggesting Elneny is going to replicate Rakitic's rise but Basle have developed some very good players in modern times.
You seem determined to find the negatives about his deal, very strange when you've never seen him kick a ball. Basel are ten points clear, probably heading for their fourth title in a row. We don't know what stage of his contract is at either. As TEG says above, these sort of deals are rarely inflated in price. Part of me thinks you are just waiting for him to fail so you can aim another kick at the manager. I don't see why though, you should have enough targets already.