Originally Posted by
Power_n_Glory
But who are they to tell Wenger how to get results? Wenger is a very stubborn guy and likes his own way just as a pointed out in my last post regarding his relationship with Pat Rice. When hearing that, I'm not surprised that he hasn't kept guys like Keown or Adams on for coaching roles because he doesn't want people undermining his authority. The Board cocked up with the David Dein move and they handed Wenger the keys to the kingdom when we went that long period without a Dein type figure next to Wenger, they can be blamed for that.
But what can they possible suggest to him that would increase our likely hood of winning silverware without dictating to him like an Abramovich, Real Madrid sort of regime? Wenger wouldn't have that and for years for Board have kept telling fans that they will give Wenger the funds if he wants them, they are supportive but if he wants to spend £13m on Oxlade Chamerlain and not £15m on Samba or Cahill, what are they going to tell him? "You're wrong Wenger, buy a CB and we'll have a better chance of winning a title"....who on the board can tell him that? Why should it take board member to tell him what it takes to win silverware? They're money men and don't have a clue about football, nowhere near as much as Wenger, anyway. I don't think they should have to tell him to buy but I think that's what actually happened on transfer deadline day. I think Gazdis has put pressure on him on to do something because he's very aware of how upset the fans are and he's probably warning Wenger that things can get ugly. But Wenger seems to think it's a media witch hunt that has whipped the fans into a frenzy. He's losing it.
When the board starts dipping their toes in this sort of thing, it gets messy. Being there to back him him and support him is good, but if they have to start suggesting things he hasn't already seen, then he's in trouble. Imagine a mechanic taking advice from an accountant on how to fix an engine oil leak. Has it really come to this?