it would be great if that was the case but he's such a master politician that any truth will get lost amongst all his double speak. i'll still buy it though.
Printable View
What is there to speculate about?
Wenger has had money to spend; not chelsea billions but he always has, way before even city came into the equation too. He has said this himself. Rick edelman quoted wenger as saying 'i'll give it back, i dont want to bankrupt your club' when he asked wenger what he would do if he was given a hypothetical 100mil to spend!
Wenger has clearly stated the youth project was his project. See the quote in the above post.
There is nothing to speculate about. No one in wengers position will last that long if they are not calling major shots.
I meant more about his general time there and stories we've never even heard.
"Hypothetical" money. What did you want him to do, start naming names? You can't seriously base any analysis on such a flimsy quote? And yes, the youth project was his. But not in isolation from the rest of the club. That's not how decisions are made in a large business. How many times did we hear the rumours of in-fighting in the boardroom? How could this have been if multiple individuals weren't involved in setting the direction of the club? I didn't say the youth policy wasn't his. I said we don't know for sure what the thinking behind or purpose of that policy was. And we don't, which is why there is something to speculate about. Most things in fact, until the day we get inside the boardroom.
He continues his top four finishes, he stays.
/thread
Yes, i can.
It is wenger's modus operandus. And those of us that avidly observed the trend way back when predicted the current malaise that surrounds the club. It is why this tete-a-tete with you in this thread started --- that there was this case to be made EVEN back then that Wenger had to go, and it was made.
That is the point of this discussion.