Originally Posted by
Letters
Where did you get the figure of 10%?
Looking at the games we've played while he's been reffing over the last 7 years or so (as I said, before that our results were excellent) they've mostly been big games. Take those out and you don't have a load of games, I'm not convinced a 10% difference - I'd be interested to know where you got that figure - is statistically significant.
And what about the first 12 games when we won 10 and drew 2? That is better than our aveage form even at our best, was he biased towards us then? If so why did he change? It's more plausible that our results were better because we were better and they were easier games and now they're worse because we are and they're generally harder games.