Random Arsenal Shit (When it's not worth starting a thread)

[Mac76]

We’ve all known for three years that he was a sex fiend

We've known nothing of the kind, simply that there were accusations

[HCZ_Reborn]

We've known nothing of the kind, simply that there were accusations

One accuser ? You’re right we simply don’t know

Multiple accusers ? Even if he’s acquitted in court, it’s most likely that he’s not been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt not that he’s innocent.


The law has a high threshold for conviction and that’s rightly the case. But again what’s more likely that three seperate women are all lying about the same footballer or that Partey has a different understanding of the word No than the rest of us

So to appeal to your autistic sensitivities, I’ll change my statement and say we knew for three years that he was likely a sex fiend

[HCZ_Reborn]

Bluesky is full of po-faced crap about it, I've no doubt the club co-operated with police or whoever if asked, that's all they can do, it's not for them to become a kangaroo court

That said I think Arteta's comments in May were ill-advised and he'd have been a lot smarter to be more reserved about the whole thing

It’s Bluesky, what exactly were you expecting. It’s like me saying I’m shocked that you have a bluesky account

Although if one was inclined to mischief and claimed one of Partey’s accusers had said “Transwomen are men” they’d quickly change their tune and say they deserved to be raped. There’s nothing more important to those people than the rights of balding perverts in dresses, wigs and poorly applied makeup

[Mac76]

So to appeal to your autistic sensitivities, I’ll change my statement and say we knew for three years that he was likely a sex fiend

A desire for accuracy and fairness has nothing to do with autism, although I'd venture to say spending your whole life on a messageboard possibly does.


Or accirate?

[HCZ_Reborn]

A desire for accuracy and fairness has nothing to do with autism, although I'd venture to say spending your whole life on a messageboard possibly does.


Or accirate?

There’s accuracy when it comes to command of facts and there’s spelling and grammar pedantry. What was the correction the other day? “If it’s legal to marry someone of 13 in certain countries than technically it’s not rape”. Because a 13 year old girl is definitely consenting to sex with a much older man, also in most of these countries rape isn’t recognised within marriage because a man has sexual rights to his wife. But if he forces himself on his wife, what are we to call it mr accuracy and fairness (two biggest self attributed misnomers I’ve come across)

Bit of a one trick pony with this “spend your whole life on a message board” thing, as I said to you a couple of weeks ago I’m
More than happy to break down the events of my life if you’re concerned for my welfare.