I remember you Mate - welcome back.
I've been thinking about our transfers. I think Edu and Co have been good - and timely with incoming players over the past 2 seasons, and the talent ID has been mostly spot on. Of course there have been some duds but there always are - noone gets it perfect.
Outgoings less so. I think that the main criticism here has been the freezing out of some players (Pepe; Tierney; Torreira; Leno - and before him Martinez spring to mind) that has trashed their sale values. But others (eg Maitland Niles; Aubameyang; Guendouzi) have not shown what it takes to play for the club, and the likes of Lokonga; Marquinos and Tavares have simply not performed well enough for there to be interest in permanent transfers out. I think that there is less cause for criticism with the 2 latter groups.
There are also further mitigating factors. Other than the biggest teams - Europe is broke, and it is simply not possible to demand high transfer fees. In the EPL there has simply been insufficient interest for players such as Tierney whom we value highly. The best example of this is Holding. He was played last season, and is a solid defender (just not in our system) - but what was the club supposed to do when we had to get him off our books but the best offer was so low?
The exception to the rule has been Saudi Arabia. As well as having an embarrassment of riches as regards quality players (they just can't play together) Chelsea clearly have Suadi connections from which they have benefitted. Citeh, Liverpool have had big name players with big reps - exactly the players that Saudi wants. I don't think that Arsenal can be blamed for not having either the players or the connections to make this happen.
Another factor is the evolution of the game. Tierney's strength is something that is clearly not as in demand given the trend to inverted FBs. Holding is a good backs to the wall defender who is being superseded by quick-running ball players.
There is also the legacy to consider. Unlike the likes of Citeh; Liverpool; Chelsea at the top and Brighton lower down, our team was until recently stuffed full of mediocre players, rather than those sought after elsewhere. This was a legacy issue that was always going to take pain to resolve. Our focus has been on improving the squad first and foremost, and then trying to trim the dross. I'm not sure that I would have wanted to delay the former until sales were completed. We now have a squad full of players for whom, IMO there would be high demand, so I think my main criticism would be not making good sales going forwards by selling at the right time, rather than looking too harshly on the past.
Timing is tricky too. People are saying that we should have sold Partey given his now recurring injury record, but I don't recall many Gooners advocating this in the transfer widow. Most thought he was essential as DM cover. By all accounts Big Gaby's agent was agitating for a Saudi move, but IMO it would have been a disaster to sell him. ESR is looking like the exception - and I attribute blame here. I cannot understand why a player who was dynamite 2 seasons ago was not given a chance last season - and if (as appears), he is still being frozen out now we should have sold him. But when? He was injured in the January transfer window, and most were pleased when the club said he was not going to be sold in the Summer.
Havertz...I agree with you thus far, but it is still early days.