Former Players Views

[Olivier's xmas twist]

I'd rather believe someone who sees things as they are rather than someone who makes excuses for Wenger just cos they have worked with him. Obviously they will be biased Robson whether you like him or not and I don't was spot on. Wenger lovers might not like to hear it but Arsenal lovers agree 100%

Ray Parlour has never worked under Wenger, like Robson or Winterburn, so they can't be baised. Highly doubt Bob and Liam are biased too, only having their say. Robson would not know what is going on at the club as much as Brady and Wilson. Which is not to say he does make some good points, that were all thinking. Don't stop him being a **** though.

[Cripps_orig]

Ray Parlour has never worked under Wenger,

Stopped reading there

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Stopped reading there

When i said worked, not as a player, as a member of staff.

[Kano]

“I believe if Steve Bould is being sidelined, he is wealthy enough, sensible enough and strong enough to resign if unhappy with his role.

which is the bottom line. the same is often said about wenger when accusations of him being a scapegoat are thrown about.

[bignev]

Robson whether you like him or not and I don't was spot on.

How do you know he was spot on? Presumably you haven't worked under Wenger so you have no idea if he is a dictator or not?

Also how can you agree that Wenger's reaction to Eduardo breaking his leg lost us the title? I think there was probably slightly more involved than that.

Robson did raise some good points but "spot on" is far from being correct, there is a lot of things that he said that he has no justification for.

[Kano]

i think it's fair to say, you've been done there.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

which is the bottom line. the same is often said about wenger when accusations of him being a scapegoat are thrown about.

Pretty much. Steve would have seen how wumger was with Pat Rice, Steve would not have taken the job, knowing he'd be treated that way. Steve does not seem the bloke to stay in the Job if he was not being listend to or treated unfairly.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

How do you know he was spot on? Presumably you haven't worked under Wenger so you have no idea if he is a dictator or not?

Also how can you agree that Wenger's reaction to Eduardo breaking his leg lost us the title? I think there was probably slightly more involved than that.

Robson did raise some good points but "spot on" is far from being correct, there is a lot of things that he said that he has no justification for.

If that what Robbo called him, then he'd need to look in the dictionary to see what that term means.

[Cripps_orig]

How do you know he was spot on? Presumably you haven't worked under Wenger so you have no idea if he is a dictator or not?Also how can you agree that Wenger's reaction to Eduardo breaking his leg lost us the title? I think there was probably slightly more involved than that.Robson did raise some good points but "spot on" is far from being correct, there is a lot of things that he said that he has no justification for.

I guess surrounding himself with Yes men in recent years would suggest he is. Of course there was more to it than Wengers reaction but it would have played a significant part. Had he gotten the team together after that injury and did the "world against us" "do it for Eduardo" speech and motivated the players, maybe we would have done better than we did.

[Power n Glory]

which is the bottom line. the same is often said about wenger when accusations of him being a scapegoat are thrown about.

It's only been a few months so I doubt he'd pack things in now it the rift rumours are true.

Plus, I'm sure he'd want to coach his own team one day and walking out on this job would look bad on his CV. He's at a big club and working under Wenger so it's best he uses his position to his advantage, regardless if he hasn't got as much responsibility right now. Who knows, if Wenger were to quit, he could be in line for the job.