I'm not trying to make anything about anything. I don't even know what "it" is here.
Your Pavlovian response about the BBC was prompted by me posting that article so it seems fairly reasonable to ask what your issue is with that article.
I don't expect your issue with the BBC to be because of one article but if this is an example then explain why.
"Avalanche" wasn't a typo, it was a quote. And in the article the response from the university was given. So is your issue the headline?
If so then you have a point.