I agreeOriginally Posted by GB.
I agree
Both are as bad at the other tbh. OX must be a deffo starter over both.
why was ox subbed?!
Not sure i found it odd but in all honesty could not see him changing the game tbh. even the crowd clapped him off so it was not really a bad sub.
To nullify his threat and cement a fuck arse boring draw.
Für eure Sicherheit
Ox was rubbish too.
Benayoun has been missed.
Nah Ox was quite Poor today in truth.
yeah but so was theo against spurs at home yet he still managed 2 goals out of nothing.
keeping him on the pitch was far more sensible than taking him off. it totally killed our creativity and deflated our already completely deflated team.
Had he taken Ox on at HT then you could be right, but i just could not see him doing much, chavs knew how to get to him.
Id have prefred ramsey to go ox, but i don't think OX going of was as costly as when he was taken off against the Mancs.
i couldnt see theo stringing two passes together against spurs but he scored twice. see my point?
you cant take off your most promising player this season and the one guy who can spark something together. what was needed was ramsey to be taken off and shifting ox to the middle. it wasn't working out wide for ox but changing tactics and his role may have changed that.
what we did not need was wenger taking him off. it gave chelsea some confidence and invited pressure.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote