so you think it doesn't matter if one plays as a box to box midfielder that they are slow on the ball, dwell on it too long and are liable to be disposessed and then give away a free kick?
What i am saying is conventionally you are right Ramsey is more naturally considered to be a box to box midfielder than Cazorla, what i am saying is that because Ramsey isn't good enough to fufill that role effectively for a team that plays like Arsenal that someone who isn't naturally a box to box type like Cazorla is better at the job than him, well he is at the moment....again at the risk of repeating myself (which i seem to be doing a lot) his legs are going.
Now again i ask in the case of Cazorla if his legs are going, there are players in the side who can pass the ball just as well and he isn't scoring goals....is it unreasonable to view Wilshere's time at Bournemouth as a potential to Cazorla being replaced by Wilshere in the first team next season.
And in the case of Ramsey, when he is slow, when his first touch is inferior to his team mates, when his tackling is at best hit and miss, when his passing is inferior to his team mates, when he can score goals but only when in a certain good vein of form......is there any sense in asking him to be the conduit between defence and attack.
The difference between the two is I rate Cazorla, but i generally think more often than not a midfielder of advancing years tends to be less effective unless they are a prominent goal scorer.
And this is the crux of the point i was making, in my view Cazorla should potentially be let go next summer and Ramsey is not good enough in my view to play for Arsenal.