Would wenger ever lose 6-1 at home to spurs?

[Letters]

Point of this thread = 0.

/thread

The point is pretty clear

[Flavs]

This ambiguity over our transfer dealings stem from Wenger. He’s never straightforward when he speaks and that’s why we have this confusion. Apparently, we went in late because we had injuries to Jack and Vermaelen. He believes it’s hard to integrate more than three players into a squad at once and from his past history he’s stuck to that principle. His rep goes all the way back to Monaco.

Sorry mate i just don't buy it, after seeing us collapse last season and after apparently half the team wanted out in the summer, losing Clichy, Nasri and Fabregas and with a £90mil transfer fund in his pocket i cant see Wenger buying just Jenko and Megamind until the last day. Someone is bleeding the club for money and i can gaurantee they aren't using it to pay off the mortgage. I bet when the financials come out in April it shows we are minted again and that somehow the transfer monies in haven't been used and are apparently just sitting there doing nothing but earning interest for Stan and the Fatman.

I know Wenger is prudent but he isn't a moron and with monies of the amount we are lead to believe we have to spend i cant see him buying Andre Santos and Park Chu-Young.

I agree with NQ (shudder) that some bastards are stealing from the coffers and trying to hide it in PR.

[Niall_Quinn]

So what's your point...

The point is, it would hardly be financial doping if the cunts in the boardroom decided to invest some money in the team. The argument from PnG is you can't criticise City on the one hand and then demand investment in Arsenal. That's BS, we're at absolute opposite ends of the spectrum.

[Niall_Quinn]

Sorry mate i just don't buy it, after seeing us collapse last season and after apparently half the team wanted out in the summer, losing Clichy, Nasri and Fabregas and with a £90mil transfer fund in his pocket i cant see Wenger buying just Jenko and Megamind until the last day. Someone is bleeding the club for money and i can gaurantee they aren't using it to pay off the mortgage. I bet when the financials come out in April it shows we are minted again and that somehow the transfer monies in haven't been used and are apparently just sitting there doing nothing but earning interest for Stan and the Fatman.

I know Wenger is prudent but he isn't a moron and with monies of the amount we are lead to believe we have to spend i cant see him buying Andre Santos and Park Chu-Young.

I agree with NQ (shudder) that some bastards are stealing from the coffers and trying to hide it in PR.

Watch and wait - it will be the same old £30mill available for transfers again, no matter how much goes in it's the same tired and static figured coming out. That's £30mill provided we sell £30mill worth of players. Someone else was slating Pulis on another thread for mentioning we had a £16mill player on the bench and that made the difference. As the other poster rightly pointed out, Stoke fucking City have a bigger net spend than us in the transfer market over recent years. Stoke City!

[Flavs]

Stoke fucking City have a bigger net spend than us in the transfer market over recent years. Stoke City!

That's cos they are trying to get to the level we are at, i would expect them to outspend us

[Power n Glory]

The board has pocketed what we've earned FFS! All the years of underinvestment, where has the money gone? The share price at Arsenal hasn't been generated because some bloke came along and stuck half a billion quid into the club. And that still hasn't happened with Kroenke. It's been generated off the back of the fans, as it should be, but none of it has been put back into the club. What's to stop Lady Nina Cocksuck kicking a few quid of the fans' money back into the club? Does she need the whole £100mill in return for her husband's £5.50 plus 2 Tesco vouchers investment? Kroenke's had to stump up, what, £500mill? Those cunts could have said, tell you what Stan we've made a killing here - give us half and kick the other half back. That's not financial doping, that's the directors giving a fuck about the club, having some sense of what represents a fair return on investment and utilising the fan's money in a way the fans would most approve. Or they could have said, Stan, we've only put in a total of 7 quid, so 500mill is a blinding return (what, what), take half of it and pay off the stadium. Nah, the cunts have looted out the lot - FUCKING CUNTS. Defend them all you want, blame Wenger all you want but it's plain as daylight who has really fucked over this club. They're the cunts dragging bags of money out the back door - don't tell me you can't see them!

Please, Wenger defends a ticket price hick and activley looks for the cheap transfer option so he can return a healthy profit to his masters. He knows damn well that the fans are unhappy about the team, but still says the answer isn't to spend. Take a look at the guy you're defending.

Yeah the owners have sold their shares and made a neat profit, but are we the only club to have experienced this? I doubt it. Sounds like you have a problem with the way clubs are run in general. This an issue with club ownership on a whole. This goes beyond Arsenal FC and maybe a schme where fans own a slice would actually help matters. It's a scheme this club is trying to promote but we can ignore that.

[Power n Glory]

Sorry mate i just don't buy it, after seeing us collapse last season and after apparently half the team wanted out in the summer, losing Clichy, Nasri and Fabregas and with a £90mil transfer fund in his pocket i cant see Wenger buying just Jenko and Megamind until the last day. Someone is bleeding the club for money and i can gaurantee they aren't using it to pay off the mortgage. I bet when the financials come out in April it shows we are minted again and that somehow the transfer monies in haven't been used and are apparently just sitting there doing nothing but earning interest for Stan and the Fatman.

I know Wenger is prudent but he isn't a moron and with monies of the amount we are lead to believe we have to spend i cant see him buying Andre Santos and Park Chu-Young.

I agree with NQ (shudder) that some bastards are stealing from the coffers and trying to hide it in PR.

Fans were wondering why Wenger wasn't spending while he was at Monaco. It was part of his downfall.

If someone is stealing from the club, then maybe the Man City model isn't such a bad idea?

[Olivier's xmas twist]

In what way has Aguero shown a lack of consistency? He's good for a goal a game at the moment, doing pretty well for his debut season so far.

Not even sure why I care about this tbh. I just find your reasoning strange.

Charlie's mental month continues.

Im saying in terms of being a top player, yeah he scores lots of goals but he'll go missing for a few games. My point was before zimm goes calling him best player ever or him better then Tevez he has to prove it.

When he scores hatricks like Messi does against the big boys and not just the small teams, then ill big him up

You guys are too harsh on Charlie. The guy is hilarious. I don't understand a word he says majority of the time and the bits I do, he'll probably repeat it in the next sentence anyway.Charlie Glorified Ollie imo

You Twat im nothing like Ollie

[Flavs]

Fans were wondering why Wenger wasn't spending while he was at Monaco. It was part of his downfall.

If someone is stealing from the club, then maybe the Man City model isn't such a bad idea?

Too late now though, not even the Shiekh's would spend the dough to buy us now. I think too but off the Uzbeki Jabba and Stan the man would cost 800mil-1billion now.

[Flavs]

Im saying in terms of being a top player, yeah he scores lots of goals but he'll go missing for a few games. My point was before zimm goes calling him best player ever or him better then Tevez he has to prove it.

When he scores hatricks like Messi does against the big boys and not just the small teams, then ill big him up

Charlie logic