Quote Originally Posted by Toronto Gooner View Post
I understand what you are saying but fact remains that Liverpool are still paying a huge amount of money for a player who has played just 61 games for Sunderland, and was booed by his fans in the second half of the season.

Interestingly, I came across this paragraph in a Liverpool blog. I have highlighted the part that caught my eye:
The capture represents a perfect example of the players Liverpool hope to bring in. They’re moving away from previous season’s signings of experienced men with little sell on value (Hodgson’s signings last season had an average age of 30, compared to 2011’s signings with an average of 22) to a nucleus of young talented signings with their futures spread out wildly in front of them. Of course it makes sense to implement these types of players, the question should be why has it taken this long for the club to move forward in this way? That’s a different issue though… http://www.thisisanfield.com/2011/06...s-royal-flush/

Anyone find that comment interesting and somewhat ironic in the Arsenal context?
As I say though, we don't know the fee. I'm not going to take any notice of a few boo-boys who will boo anyone for any reason.

I've heard the fee could be £13m + NGog. Which is an epic swindle.

It is probably going to be more than that but it's a transfer for the next 4/5 years. If we win the league in 2015 () with Henderson at the centre then it's a good deal. We will have some Gerrard-shaped boots to fill quite soon. Then again he could be let go for £5m after 3 years. I'd rather take the risk with youngsters, than see other clubs take them.