I put a a tenner Walcott will sign for manu. With Nani on his way out, Walcott will be a perfect replacement on their right hand side (wing or striker). Not to mention Walcott and RVP has a decent understanding on the pitch. :coffee:
Printable View
I put a a tenner Walcott will sign for manu. With Nani on his way out, Walcott will be a perfect replacement on their right hand side (wing or striker). Not to mention Walcott and RVP has a decent understanding on the pitch. :coffee:
:haha:
:lol:
Back on topic, so how much will we get for the lad :coffee:
Yeah I agree it's not a "black and white" situation and there are plenty of "grey" areas clouding the issue but the bottomline is Theo is an England regular and one of our best players, commercially he's our most high profile player. I agree that player wages are absurd but "we are where we are". House prices are absurd too...but a "City Banker" has no qualms in paying over a million pounds for a Georgian Terrace in Islington that is overlooked by High rise council blocks (I've nothing against council blocks...I was brought up in one in my early years).
I don't think any of this is about exploitation but I think as a Club we should value our assets and do as much as we can to keep hold of them. Theo isn't really being unreasonable in his wage demands, we clearly have the budget to pay him closer to what he wants and to be brutally honest I don't think he's being unreasonable about wanting more time up top. Sure no player should demand where he plays...but I do think he partially has a case here.
Man City and Chelsea can throw wages around until everybody is blue in the face, I think the issue with Theo isn't that he wants a Man City style wage but more that he wants to be paid according to his value to the team.
He's delivered for this team for 2 seasons now, sure he's inconsistent but this boy has star potential and he's starting to produce BIG performances this season on a more consistent basis.
Knowing our club, he probably asked for 80k and we offered 75k. That's just the way things are done by us.
apparently theo's house going up for sale story is bullshit.
his parents got divorced about a year ago. the house he bought for them is the one up for sale. which would make sense.
of course the media knew all of this but still decided to print a completely false twisted story :rolleyes:
even says 'Thieves struck after Theo’s parents and older brother had left the home to...'
not his house. parents house.
to the media:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7...n0tao1_250.gif
Why is "Theo going to be player-manager at Chavs" not an option on the poll :angry:
If we lose Theo as well after yet another contract run down, we may as well lock the door and turn off the lights because the club would have sunk to new depths! Get your black scarves ready!
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/n...-question.htmlQuote:
To mark the launch of the Nike GS2 boot Theo Walcott will be hosting a live Q&A in London on 26 November at 2pm and the Premier League is offering two lucky winners the chance to attend along with a guest.
To enter they need to send an email to UKFootball@nike.com with 'PREMIER THEO' in the subject line. Only emails received between 2pm GMT Friday November 23, 2012 and 2pm GMT Saturday November 24, 2012 will have a chance to win the prize.
Theo will also be taking part in a Webchat and you can ask him a question by tweeting using the hashtag #ASKTHEO.
http://football-talk.co.uk/70652/wal...oin-liverpool/Quote:
Arsenal attacker Theo Walcott is reluctant to join Liverpool due to his preference for staying in London and the fact the Reds are not seen as a step up from the Gunners, according to the Daily Mail.
The 23-year-old’s future has been under intense scrutiny after he turned down Arsenal’s offer of a contract extension in the summer. With less than 8 months left to run on his current deal, Walcott could be on the move as soon as January if Arsenal decide to cash in rather than lose him on a free next summer.
Liverpool and Chelsea are among the clubs strongly linked with a move and the Premier League duo are ready to pounce should the former Southampton youngster fail to commit his future to the Gunners in the coming weeks.
However, Brendan Rodgers is going to have to work hard to try and persuade the England international to move to Liverpool with Walcott believed to have reservations about moving to Merseyside.
The Stanmore-born ace want’s to remain in London and with his fiance also attending university in the capital, neither want to uproot and move up north.
Walcott is also questioning the wisdom in leaving a club who have been in the Champions League for the last 13 seasons, for one who have not qualified for the last three years and have little chance of qualifying for Europe’s premier competition next year after a poor start to this seasons Premier League campaign.
Walcott’s agent also represents Brendan Rodgers, so he’s aware of Liverpool’s interest and their willingness to meet his wage demands, but it seems a move to the Reds is unlikely now.
Read more Arsenal transfer news | Chelsea transfer news | Liverpool transfer news
A move to Chelsea would ensure Walcott remained in London and competed for trophies each year, but he’d be considered nothing more than a squad player at Stamford Bridge, so it leaves his options limited.
This has left Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger confident he can find a compromise to ensure the forward remains at the Emirates, with the Frenchman making a personal plea to the Arsenal board last week to ask them to up their £75,000-a-week offer.
Talk about a massive conflict of interests. Even the banking world wouldn't (officially) allow shit like this.Quote:
Walcott’s agent also represents Brendan Rodgers
Interesting if true.Quote:
with the Frenchman making a personal plea to the Arsenal board last week to ask them to up their £75,000-a-week offer.
Yeah like that's going to make a difference. For the 500th time, he doesn't want more money.
All Theo Walcott wants is for Arsene Wumget to sign Honda and other such china bros who can then to invent a time-machine where we can travel back to a time when it was relevant for teams to play big-man, little-man 4-4-2 filth. Olivier Giroud is passable as the 'big man' but he is a bit far too motherfucking sexy - the role should ideally be played by a cartoon-faced mongy beanpole like Crouch. However Theo Walcott is not a demanding man. Theo Walcott is a reasonable guy who understands this current climate and so doesn't demand it. Written into the contract should be a legal obligation of Giroud to train with Walcott 4 times a day rehearsing goal celebrations, preferably of the variety where Theo can jump on the back of Giroud displaying a united front of racial harmony, while also serving as a valuable audition to appear on Strictly Come Dancing in year 2018. And if you don't believe this is all Theo Walcott desires, you will be utterly shocked when he is definitely playing the central role and not at all playing out wide for Man Utd, Chelsea or Man City.
Play the Welbeck and Sturridge cards all you like but Theo is after love. Man love. Basically he wants Wenger to fuck him up the centre circle but Wenger is little bit reluctant until Theo proves his age. Theo even grew a tache (of sorts) but he still can't get the meat injection he craves. Giroud is already taken by half the fags in France, Ox won't fuck him because, by God, he is straight as they come. And when Jack shouts "Man Up!" it really doesn't help. So Theo thinks if he does enough shopping it will dampen the yearning, but he'll need cash for that. And the shops are better in Chelsea - if you are a bender. His agent has played on this of course, hitting Theo while he is young and before he grows out of it. All in all this is why I'm against homosexuality.
:haha::haha:
No Theo Wallclock on the Official 2013 Calendar :popcorn:
Yep, he's probably gone in January.