Which is why We wanted a perm deal if reports are belived to be true, which would have made more sense if they want all that money for a loan.
Printable View
Assuming it is £8-10m of course.
I've seen an equal number saying £2m fee plus the wages, which would probably be at about 40 weeks so ~£3-4m.
In other words, nobody knows the details.
We didn't want a permanent deal, we wanted an option to buy at the end of the loan. The problem seems to be that Liverpool were willing to pay a greater proportion of his wages, which seems feasible given that we're notoriously stingy when it comes to wages. Remember Arteta had to take a wage CUT to come to Arsenal.
From being a decent summer, suddenly it's becoming an average one. I'm pleased with the signings we've made, however having sold 2 first teamers including the guy who basically carried the team last season and was our best player our need for a couple more signings is pretty high.
Not long left to sort things out and it's very feasible we could end up with noone else which would be a massive disappointment and would leave us almost where we were last season
Sahin may not have been available on the terms we wanted, but couldn't we have found this out at the start rather than hanging around for so long?
Nope. We should never negotiate!
Never said he was, i said we may as well have bought him as in tried too.
Not oringialy but there were sources Wenger wanted him on a perm deal and he never wanted to leave madrid and this is where the money stuff came into it but like i said souces and not (AFC Camden either).
Cesc took a pay cut to leave us whats your point.Quote:
Remember Arteta had to take a wage CUT to come to Arsenal.