When £40million would have got you a Theirry Henry, a kolo toure, a robert pires, a ljunberg, a Bergkamp, a Lauren , a Gilberto Silva and leave you with more than enough change to get a Viera and an Edu
When £40million would have got you a Theirry Henry, a kolo toure, a robert pires, a ljunberg, a Bergkamp, a Lauren , a Gilberto Silva and leave you with more than enough change to get a Viera and an Edu
It probably wouldn't.
it would haveOriginally Posted by GayPete
I don't think it would.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
£50m and you'd be right...
Remember those days when 40 million quid would have got you Liverpool FC.. probably in the 70s.
Arsene Wenger, the only football manager that got paid 8 million quid to do nothing but sit on his arse..
more like 40 mil plus a quid...
Combined cost of that team 48.5 million....so if we pay Liverpool want they want for Suarez it will be more than the combined cost of the players you've mentioned.
Remember the days you could buy Chelsea for £1
Society is now one polished horde
Formed by two mighty tribes, the bores and the bored.
"After all, it was the Gunners’ goalkeeper who started the move that culminated in Thomas’ crowning glory. It was Lukic who, in injury time, decided to throw the ball out to Lee Dixon rather than lump it long..."
if you buy them as we did, ie unproven but talented players, then yes 40 million would do it. if you buy them after their time at arsenal, 40 million wouldnt come close
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote