This occured to me after my debate with Falvs on the other thread.
There's been much (and some justified) criticism of Wenger, his methods, philosophy and motivation.
He's been accused of being stuck in his ways; unable to adapt and lacking ideas, and the feeling is that we're stagnating as a club and that our manager is stale.
But I wonder whether this is really the case? The tactical 'naivity' that we complain about; the focus on his team rather than the opposition; the stubborn adherence to his methods have always been his hallmarks - he hasn't changed. We talk about the rest of the league catching him up - and they have - but is this not more a case of other clubs making the most of the information and methods available than Wenger taking his eye off the ball.
I suppose that you could say that the reason we've fallen down the pecking order is nothing whatsoever to do with lack of ideas/motivation. Its the simple fact that more money=better players.
On the other hand - faced with a changing football landscape, we fans are suffering from shattered illusions; the humbling feeling of no longer being top dogs and the corrosive effect of transfer seasons made depressing because of want-away talent. And as fans, we are talking ourselves into a bleaker outlook that the situation merits.
Is it us that are getting stale rather than Wenger?