Clichy has left. And Nasri in talks with Citeh.

[Letters]

First of all, you keep posting links that people are unable to view.

I only posted one link. You should be able to see it now. I'd made it so guests couldn't see the Arsenal Debate section of the old board by accident

Secondly, I've passed no comment on the value of the transfer, I've just pointed out that some felt he was crap and £7m is good business and others think otherwise an feel we have strengthened a rival on the cheap.

Fair enough. I'm not sure it's great business but I'm not bothered about Clichy going. He's very prone to stupid mistakes (often in otherwise good performances, strangely). I don't think him being there strengthens them.

[Xhaka Can’t]

I can go on the old board as a guest and can see it fine but when i click on the links Letters is posting, it says i cant view them

It isn't just you.

[Letters]

I can go on the old board as a guest and can see it fine but when i click on the links Letters is posting, it says i cant view them

Try again? I made an error with the permissons on the old site which should be fixed now.

[Coney]

It isn't just you.

Well, he is banned on old GW.

[Cripps_orig]

Try again? I made an error with the permissons on the old site which should be fixed now.

Fine now

[Xhaka Can’t]

I only posted one link. You should be able to see it now. I'd made it so guests couldn't see the Arsenal Debate section of the old board by accident



Fair enough. I'm not sure it's great business but I'm not bothered about Clichy going. He's very prone to stupid mistakes (often in otherwise good performances, strangely). I don't think him being there strengthens them.

I think Clichy has the raw talent - we all saw that, but he never progressed as he should because of how he was (or wasn't_) coached. I think he could be a much better player for City than he was for us. Time will tell.

For the record, I reckon Theo would have been a much better player today had he been with someone like Chelsea.

[Boss]

has this thought occured to anyone? perhaps wenger told clichy he wasnt wanted because of his poor season and has plans to replace him already?

or is it just bash wenger because clichy left and we dont know why he left?

Wenger one week ago:

“We have started talks with Gael and want him to stay,” said Wenger.

[Cripps_orig]

Well, he is banned on old GW.

I thought that would be the problem but then i remembered i was logged out.

How else could i go on GW whilst i was banned to do some ?

[Letters]

I think Clichy has the raw talent - we all saw that, but he never progressed as he should because of how he was (or wasn't_) coached. I think he could be a much better player for City than he was for us. Time will tell.

For the record, I reckon Theo would have been a much better player today had he been with someone like Chelsea.

So you think we just got lucky with players like Vieira and Cesc who became world class under Wenger and his coaching staff?
IMO injuries have held Theo back more than any problem at Arsenal.
As for Clichy, he's frustrating because he's basically a decent player IMO but he is prone to baffling lapses which cost us goals.

[Özim]

has this thought occured to anyone? perhaps wenger told clichy he wasnt wanted because of his poor season and has plans to replace him already?

or is it just bash wenger because clichy left and we dont know why he left?

Sure, the guy who holds on to cr*p like Denilson and Almunia for years tells a first teamer he's not wanted.