yes
no
unsure
hearing the rumours today, its bollocks most likely however, if it is true, would this be an acceptable deal? out of the two, i would rather give theo the money to stay then have nani, but if theo is off and we replaced him with nani, it would be a good move i think. Nani can be a very good player on his day, and is a winner, am i right in thinking he would have won everything in england and the champions league? not bad.
Nani would want more money than Theo anyway, so just give Theo (who's better anyway) the money and buy someone else.
though i think if wenger went to theo, and said im giving your 100k a week to nani, it would arguably be his greatest wumger moment ever.Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
Theo is better and I'd rather keep him.
If he does go then I suppose Nani wouldn't be the worst replacement in the world, he'd be an upgrade on Gervinho at least.
Last edited by Marc Overmars; 11-12-2012 at 05:52 PM.
There's a very simple answer to this.
If we are able to buy Nani, that means we shouldn't buy him.
That is true.
would you sign a winger thats scored 10 goals and 7 assists this season?
if he was at another club you'd say sign him up.
for an extra £4m we can get theo on a long term deal.
another no brainer.
No keep Theo, Nani is poor at the best of times.
"I really like Arsenal. Do you really like Arsenal, or only Arsenal with trophies?" - Dennis Bergkamp.
"Which Arsenal do they want back, the one Arsene created?" - Tony Adams.
Good job these aren't the best of times.
You stupid monkey!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote