User Tag List

Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 158

Thread: The Arseblog Thread

  1. #61
    Cat give me a paw!! Flavs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Monday 30th

    Arsenal have had all summer to buy players. Why they haven't done so until now is very much an area of conjecture. Have we been unwilling to do so or simply unable to get our business done?

    For all our frustrations, it's hard to imagine that we've remained as static as we have through choice. If the manager and the club accept we need new players just 3 days before the window closes I think it would be reasonable to assume they were aware of this throughout the summer. The defeat to Manchester United so close to the deadline may have sparked a bit of urgency, but I very much doubt it was a case of 'Oh, I thought our squad was better than that, better buy some players so!'

    So what has been the problem? The money has been available since the get-go. Our transfer fund, pre-Nasri and Cesc, was around £35m which was to be boosted by sales of 'fringe' players. How many of these players have we actually sold? Vela, on loan. Denilson, on loan (despite the fact I'm pretty sure there were concrete bids from Spain). Almunia, gone nowhere. Clichy, we got some money for. What of Nicklas Bendtner, for example? Back in July Arsene confirmed he was being left out of things because he was in talks with other clubs <http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/wenger-bendtner-and-almunia-could-leave>
    , and the player's father and agent confirmed there had been lots of bids <http://news.arseblog.com/2011/07/lots-of-bids-for-bendtner-bendtner/>
    .

    So what's holding things up? Are we to take it that not one of the clubs who have been given permission to talk to him have managed to find a financial package attractive enough for him to accept? He made it very clear he wanted to leave the club. He might well be on higher wages here than he'd get elsewhere but that doesn't mean a new club has to give him exactly the same. You have to ask have Arsenal carried out their side of things properly? I can't believe that there wasn't one offer acceptable to Bendtner, especially given his desire to leave.

  2. #62
    Wibble Coney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe Wenger realised that Bendtner is tall so he is going to play him as a CB and save transfer money.

  3. #63
    Cat give me a paw!! Flavs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Transfer day

    Right then, here we are. It's TDD. Transfer Deadline Day. The sporting equivalent of Valentine's Day or Mother's Day. A load of shite made up by Hallmark simply to sell you tat you don't need.

    And you don't need me to tell you that's exactly what Sky Sports have done with football. As clubs feel the pressure to buy tat they don't need (or tat they do!), their intrepid reporters like Johnny Sixphones and Jim 'Redknapp Rimmer' White, feed us non-stop information about who might on their way here, or who they understand is going there and for whom there's talk of a medical somewhere else.

    Most years Arsenal fans are on the periphery of TDD. We go into it with hope and not much expectation. Arsene has already said he's done his business but, tantalisingly, says that if a bargain crops up then it's not impossible. As the window draws to a close that flicker of optimism is snuffed out, other clubs go about the place like market traders, a-haggling here, a-bartering there, and we end up with nothing. But today should be different.

    We know of three deals done or very close to being done, more on those soon, but Arsene still has a big chunk of change burning a hole in his Farrah slacks pockets and we still need a player or two. So it could be an interesting one. There's hope, but there's also expectation. Who might we be after? How much will we spend on them? Will we break our transfer record? Who might we sell? What does Sixphones have for lunch? All these questions and more will be answered before the day is out. In the meantime though, we've done some business although not all of it has been made official.

  4. #64
    Cat give me a paw!! Flavs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thursday the 1st

    Well that was something, eh?

    I can't quite remember a transfer deadline day like it from an Arsenal point of view. I remember when we signed Gallas, Denilson and Baptista back in 2006. Actually, that's a lie. I remember waking up the next morning to discover we'd signed them, but my sense is there was nowhere near the intensity that we saw yesterday.

    And it went right till the chimes of Big Jim, the transfer deadline clock, rang out. All in all, I think it was a pretty successful day and the last few days have done plenty to counter the negativity that rightly surrounded us since the Old Trafford debacle. Whether or not we'd have been as active if that result hadn't happened I just can't say. And frankly it doesn't matter one bit. The important thing is that we needed players, with fairly obvious skillsets, and we got them.

    The club first confirmed the deals we already knew about. Park was confirmed earlier in the week, then we got André Santos and Per Mertesacker. But we knew about them already. Where was the fresh meat?
    The exciting new player we hadn't been linked with? The one that would make people go 'Ooooh'? The one that would add creativity to our midfield.

  5. #65
    Wibble Coney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://arseblog.com/2011/09/we-won/

    This is a team under massive pressure with little in the way of confidence, coming into a game with new players who have only been at the club a couple of days in some cases, on the back of an 8-2 thrashing, and any expectation that the feelgood factor provided by the transfer market activity would instantly spark an on-pitch revival was misplaced.

    I said it yesterday, we are going to have to fight and scrap our way into anything approaching form. Yesterday was the first bout, we might have ended up a bit bloodied, but we did what we had to do. Yesterday was never about performance. Would people have been happier if we’d played scintillatingly well and drawn/lost? I don’t think so.

    Confidence and form is built far more on results than how you play. How many times have we spoken about how well we played but just couldn’t find the breakthrough? I’d really rather not be sitting here this morning trying to dissect one of those games. The importance of the points was paramount, it didn’t matter how we got them, once we did. And we did.

  6. #66
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    The Arsenal Podcast on 4th October was very interesting, it dissected the Arsenal Manager and the transfer question into bite size pieces

    - Questions over extra marital affairs and his parents passing away has made him a more insular figure towards the press

    - He has been allowed to assume more power and more responsibility in the day to day running of the club.

    - The money has been there for transfers and for wages for the last few years.

    - He was persuaded by the board to sell Samir Nasri, before the same of Nasri and Fabregas......he had 40 million to spend on transfers alone

    - Ivan Gazidis the chief executive takes no part in transfer negotiations.

  7. #67
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fuck that IS interesting.

    Did his parents pass away this Summer? Might explain a few things.

    Your post deserves to have greater prominence given the debate about the board on the Silent Stan thread. I've always suspected that the failure to spend was not a board dictum.

    I wonder whether it is unusual for a CE not to take part in transfer negotiations - but the fact that Gazidis doesn't suggests that the board isn't holding Wenger back - as many would suggest.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  8. #68
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    The Arsenal Podcast on 4th October was very interesting, it dissected the Arsenal Manager and the transfer question into bite size pieces

    - Questions over extra marital affairs and his parents passing away has made him a more insular figure towards the press

    - He has been allowed to assume more power and more responsibility in the day to day running of the club.

    - The money has been there for transfers and for wages for the last few years.

    - He was persuaded by the board to sell Samir Nasri, before the same of Nasri and Fabregas......he had 40 million to spend on transfers alone

    - Ivan Gazidis the chief executive takes no part in transfer negotiations.
    Where is this Podcast? You sure it's the 4th October? I can't find it. Do you have a link?

  9. #69
    Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it was from alex flynn of the guardian

    http://arseblog.com/2011/09/defendin...-arsecast-210/

    Richard Law is the other guy that is involved with transfers, not Gazidis. It is Richard that is pointed out by a few people as elongating the process.

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Tuffnutz View Post
    it was from alex flynn of the guardian

    http://arseblog.com/2011/09/defendin...-arsecast-210/

    Richard Law is the other guy that is involved with transfers, not Gazidis. It is Richard that is pointed out by a few people as elongating the process.
    Yeah Alex Fynn, LDG warned me about this chump.

    Anyway, James Olley did an interesting piece in the Standard a couple weeks back about Dick Law. In it he asked several agents what they thought about Dick, and although some thought he was decent (albeit lacking the contacts of Dein) one of the agents said something interesting.

    He said that the reason why transfer negotiations with Arsenal took so long was because Law had to act as an intermediary between the various vested interests of different members of the board, be they corporate, equity or power.

    Interesting because until now I've always viewed the board as 'The Board', a single entity. However this agent's comments paint a different picture, that of a collection of people with differing and conflicting agendas.

    Corporate. Equity. Power. Those were the exact words used. If true it points to a level of self-interest that thinks little of jeopardising the club's on-field success.

    I'm sure NQ will like that.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •