Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post
Its what Wenger said and you believe everything he says regardless of what its about.

For you he can do and say no wrong.
No, that's not what I believe, that's what you say I believe. Two totally different things. Consider a similar scenario. Wenger is asked, "Is your name Arsene Wenger?" - he truthfully answers yes because what's the point trying to lie about it? As with the list of penalty takers, it would be stupid and pointless to lie about something so trivial. Then if you ask him, "Is Stan Kroenke a heinous, rotten, shitbag **** who is destroying the club and football in general with his ****ish, greedy, fucked-up anti-football giant sucking leech routine?", Wenger may say no, Stan is a good guy. I wonder why? Maybe for the same reason as he wouldn't call Walcott a greedy **** right in the middle of a contract negotiation. There's a danger calling Walcott an avaricious, selfish, ungrateful, disloyal piece of overrated shit would sour the negotiations somewhat. So he probably wouldn't do that. Can you see the subtle difference between the trivial and the complex?