Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
Well just because he's not right at the top of the hierarchy of things that are fucked up with the club. Doesn't make it any less baffling that we have kept him, rather than have a back up keeper who could potentially replace an ageing Cech.
Do you think Sir Ches couldn't have made a similar sort of mistake?

A handful of sporadic games can't determine whether we have a good replacement for Cech. Is this even worth debating?