Quote Originally Posted by HCZ_Reborn View Post
I explain why I don’t rate these players and you in the unsophisticated way you do, think because they score a goal or have a good game that this negates my opinion about these players


Gakpo and Eze are examples of the types of players where athleticism and strength are favoured more than technique, now that’s fine but I imagine them playing for a team such as ours which is already bereft of creativity and think hmm really (and I make that point because for reasons I still don’t really get you wished we’d signed Gakpo, and I compared a player we were linked with, with Eze)


It’s definitely not that I have lamented constantly the lack of creative and technically talented players in the game. For you it’s an indefensible position which needs to be corrected like it’s a spelling mistake.

And only today the way you jumped on a post I made to argue against something id not even said, does rather highlight that this is a bit of a problem for you
Literally everyone except you sees Eze as a creative player, as for Gakpo I didn't at any time say we should have signed him tbh, I just said he was a good player while you dug a deeper and deeper hole saying he wasn't, just like you were so sure Liverpool wouldn't keep going and win the title (whereas I said all along that they could)

You simply said Gakpo was 'overrated' you didn't talk about whether he could do this, that or the other, as for Rice you consistenly said he couldn't help us in attack when he's so good there, including in his distribution and ball carrying which you specifically criticised, that most people now want him to stay at 8 rather then be a 6