
Originally Posted by
Terry Tuffnutz
i disagree. the point of dropping gerv and walcott was to try and retain the ball with benny and rosicky, a tactic that has worked in the past.
the problem was, we weren't getting the ball back to retain it, which was the main problem.
keeping gerv and walcott on is fine if they were doing something with the ball but i don't see the point of keeping them on if their final balls were useless and gave the ball to fulham anyway.