Good read. Thanks for posting.Originally Posted by AKBapologist
Good read. Thanks for posting.
I didn't think you got that for finishing 8th.
It's written very poorly, and for a big blogger like that, you'd expect a degree more reflection and objectivity on the big points.
He's used the snippets to paint his own picture, as he did with his first podcast a few weeks back, which was truly awful.
The AST report is far more insightful, and provides much more basis for debate and discussion....as I'm sure there was at the meeting yesterday.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
Im sure he's just posting the main points for the blog.
There's nothing wrong with it.
He was at the meeting, we werent, but he has revealed more about what was said than the AST have.
No. what the AST have done, is produce a report based on best-guess, which is well thought out and constructive. It raises genuine questions, but doesn't look to develop an agenda.
What this chap has done, is written down all the bits that suit his line of thinking, and impart them to his readers, rough-shod, and in a way that shows little understanding of what he's typing from his notes and sketches.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
Oh I see.
Basically, you dont like it so its wrong.
Ok.
got the painters in?
got the painters in?
The AST piece is their analysis of the financials.
The legrove blog is just telling us the rest of what went on at the meeting and what was discussed.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote