User Tag List

View Poll Results: Wenger out?

Voters
52. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    38 73.08%
  • No

    14 26.92%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 472

Thread: Should Wenger go?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    He doesn't need 200 million, he didn't have anywhere near that at Inter and yet built a team that won everything and disposed of Barca on the way (in the 1st leg they caned them).

    He'd get rid of the dross, bring in quality and we'd seem to good tactics and substitutions for a change.
    he will you think quality is cheap these days guess again. and when i say 200 mill i include wages.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    he will you think quality is cheap these days guess again. and when i say 200 mill i include wages.
    Again I point to the team at Inter, he didn't spend much and spent money he got from selling players......we could sell some of our squad and replace them with better players for sure...in addition we have money to spend.

  3. #3
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    Again I point to the team at Inter, he didn't spend much and spent money he got from selling players......we could sell some of our squad and replace them with better players for sure...in addition we have money to spend.
    even so top players cost 30-40 mill so eve if we got rid off the dross we still need about 5/6 which would be 200-300 on transfers and then if they wanted top wages that could be another 100 mill even more. Only way it would workif we had a suga daddy or Stan sold to the russain or Stan pumped money in. don't seem like it will happen anytime soon.

    He never needed to spend big at Inteer the bulk of the team was there and at chavs here we need a big rebuild so lots coming in is a must not just 2 or 3.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    even so top players cost 30-40 mill so eve if we got rid off the dross we still need about 5/6 which would be 200-300 on transfers and then if they wanted top wages that could be another 100 mill even more. Only way it would workif we had a suga daddy or Stan sold to the russain or Stan pumped money in. don't seem like it will happen anytime soon.

    He never needed to spend big at Inteer the bulk of the team was there and at chavs here we need a big rebuild so lots coming in is a must not just 2 or 3.
    Van der Vaart didn't cost that, Kompany didn't cost that, Parker didn't cost that....saying they cost 40 million is just not true...some will but others are available if you look closely enough.

    The problem we've had is that our manager only spends on kids and nobodies, he wastes money like nobodies business...if he'd been wise he could have bought some real quality rather than wasting it on unknowns and journeymen.

  5. #5
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    Van der Vaart didn't cost that, Kompany didn't cost that, Parker didn't cost that....saying they cost 40 million is just not true...some will but others are available if you look closely enough.
    Thats then this is now prices have gone up. VDV wa only cheap because Real wanted to flogg him not because it was his natural price.

    Kompany has never been a £40 mill player so not sure why you'dbring him up.
    Last edited by Olivier's xmas twist; 23-02-2012 at 07:55 PM.

  6. #6
    Member Dennis Bendtner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3,297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'd need to give Maureen money to buy a new midfield if we wanted to be particularly interesting. Gervinho's no Ronaldo, at the end of the day. Sexy as he is. Counterattacks can be very good to watch i.e. his Real team, but you'd need the right players who tend to cost a fair whack.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennis Bendtner View Post
    You'd need to give Maureen money to buy a new midfield if we wanted to be particularly interesting. Gervinho's no Ronaldo, at the end of the day. Sexy as he is. Counterattacks can be very good to watch i.e. his Real team, but you'd need the right players who tend to cost a fair whack.
    He'd have some money, plus if we got rid of the dross we should have a fair bit more. What he does bring even without signings is tactics and an ability to get players working well together, he knows how to build a team and the difference will be almost instantly visible.

  8. #8
    MOe Marc Overmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    32,370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennis Bendtner View Post
    You'd need to give Maureen money to buy a new midfield if we wanted to be particularly interesting. Gervinho's no Ronaldo, at the end of the day. Sexy as he is. Counterattacks can be very good to watch i.e. his Real team, but you'd need the right players who tend to cost a fair whack.
    He'd need a lot of cash here because hardly any of our players are what you'd typically call Mourinho players. He'd flog Arteta and Ramsey in an instant and buy 2 solid all action centre mids and build from there. Gervais, Arshavin and Walnut will be told to sort their lives out or they'll be gone as well.

    The reason I wouldn't mind him is because he is extremely ruthless, basically if you're not with him, you're against him. Some of our players are in need of some tough love and he'd certainly shake things up. He'd make us hard to beat and that is something Wenger has failed miserably at.

    Of course the off putting thing is that he's a massive **** with an ego guranteed to land the club in hot water. I'm not even sure how long he'd stay as well. I fully expect him to win the league with Madrid this year, then do his attention seeking ritual of throwing his medal into the crowd so everyone starts reading into it and talking about his next move.
    Last edited by Marc Overmars; 23-02-2012 at 08:24 PM.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    Thats then this is now prices have gone up. VDV wa only cheap because Real wanted to flogg him not because it was his natural price.

    Kompany has never been a £40 mill player so not sure why you'dbring him up.
    Come off it

  10. #10
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    Come off it
    So you don't thin VDV would have ever cost more then 8 mill if real wanted to keep him, or Kompany would have been sold for 40 mill at HSV. Maybe now he is but then no way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •