Final Weekend Fixtures - What Will Be, Will Be - Sunday 13th May 2012 3pm

[Power n Glory]

He's a twat for voicing an opinion is he?

And it's a bit rich you calling some a wum.

Ignore that chump.

[Gubby Allen]

I have not see other fans do this and im not bothered if they do. But calling peoples haters etc because they won't praise City is pathetic.

But I'm a Man Utd hater and despise them winning it but will usually offer congratulations to them. The year after the Chelsea run of titles was probably Fergie's best achievement. I found it unbearable but accept they were terrific.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Well you never know with the media how they portray things but they interviewed half a dozen Man Utd fans outside the ground on Sky & the beeb, they all congratulated city, admitted they were probably the better side and didn't bring up money, QPR fans too, albeit they're probably in shock they'd stayed up. Then various other people have al offered congratulations. I haven't been on every forum, but based on that it seems odd we're more put out by it than even Man Utd and seemingly many others.

Maybe we are.

Yes because UTD fans on tv will really go and say City bought the league they did not deserve to win it. im sure they want to look bitter. But like i have said City should have won the league yonks ago, UTD did not have a decent team this season and really should never have caught up with them.

Well done to city for winning the league though.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Ignore that chump.

If anyones a chump its you, you rat bastard.

Grow up you ****.

[Coney]

[Dennis Bendtner]

A GW warzone when we secure 3rd place?

Interesting.

[Gubby Allen]

Why is the Blackburn title of 95 not looked upon with any hatred or contempt?

Or Shearer ever referred to as that money grabbing bastard who bought his only trophy?

[McNamara That Ghost...]

Ok it is a long time since the matches have finished now, that's it for the namecalling. Thanks.

[Niall_Quinn]

There is a difference but I don't care because you and I both know that City's money isn't what's stopping us from winning the league.

Also, this is why I say it's jealousy. This is specifically aimed at you and nobody else. Each week you say we need to get rid of our board for owners that care and willing to spend money. You berate Stan for not spending his American millions on our squad. But at the same time you dismiss City because they've brought in owners that are willing to spend. It's a bit hypocritical in my opinion. Sour grapes too.

Where you and me differ is that I believe sound tactical management and discipline can win us the league. That all comes from the manager. You on the other hand have been arguing all season for new owners and better quality players over tactical/managerial changes. You're arguing for a City type model but on a smaller scale.

There is a difference between how we won titles, it did cost money but overall we had a fresh manager that developed a brand of football that nobody else could live with. We need to get back to that. City have bought they're way up from being a B class team to top tier. They're able to compete with the best but it doesn't mean they automatically win the league each year.

I've said this to you before but making a profit in the transfer window and lunatic levels of spending are not the only two options. And it doesn't really matter whether we win, compete or get relegated - city's level of spending is still a joke. They are a poisonous operation. They are one of the few clubs that could have held Tevez to account for his actions, instead they rewarded him. Sickening stuff and the true measure of what shitty is all about - cash. Nothing else.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

Why is the Blackburn title of 95 not looked upon with any hatred or contempt?

Or Shearer ever referred to as that money grabbing bastard who bought his only trophy?

Probably because Jack Walker was a Blackburn supporter. And really, how many seasons was it they went (comparitively) mental with spending?