Super Super Quality Transfer Speculation & Shit

[Niall_Quinn]

The biggest offer was no doubt from City. I dont think he joined them.

He said he talked to all 3 clubs, agreed personal terms with all 3 but his decision he said would be based on where he plays most.

Now we know. If that isnt down to football reasons then what is?

And lets say you are right and he did go for money? So what? Its what every single person in every job would do. All that shows is Hazard is human. Do we critisise him for being human? You dont have to answer that cos you arent right.

How do you know the biggest offer was from city? The only thing we've heard from them (which may or may not be true like anything lese) is they WOULDN'T meet his wage demands. That doesn't sound like agreeing terms to me.

[Cripps_orig]

he said before the CL final that he will be playing in manchester. you telling me the chavs didnt come in with mega bucks to sway him

He said after it that Chelseas win made him change his mind

[Özim]

Most managers go 6 years winning nothing, especially in leagues where money is the determinant factor. We should have beaten that scummy team in the CC, that was a fuck up. But even winning that we'd still be listening to "what manager goes 6 years with only a CC win?" Criticism is fine but when every single possible reason to criticise is dragged up 24/7 it's boring. For all our faults as a club we're still the 3rd best in England having spent a NEGATIVE amount on transfers because of the greedy bastards that run the place. But it's always Wenger this, Wenger that.

Nonsense, top managers don't they won't accept that, they pick up trophies on the way, he's not a top manager.

Sorry but 6 years of largely cr*p if I'm honest isn't good enough, we've been predictable, lazy, lacked organisation and tactics and have seen the same problems year on year, in addition failing to plan for the loss of our better players, that's not management that's complacency, the guy never learns from his mistakes and always has an excuse, he's had his chance blown it big time and somehow he' still here? He should gone several years ago.

It amazes me you criticise footballers and yet don't criticise a manager earning 7+ million a year when he's winning nothing and no I couldn't give a toss what the board thinks, he should have more pride in his job than that...unless money is the only thing he's interested in of course!

[Cripps_orig]

Cripps I don't think personal terms were agreed, if they were he'd have actually spoken with all three clubs. It was a transfer fee that was agreed, I think.

His agent says terms have been agreed with all three. All that remains is for Belgian ace Hazard — whose buyout clause is around £30million — to pick who he wants to join.

http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Fe...-ten-days.aspx

[Cripps_orig]

What?

Cause he's city scum.

Fair point

[Ollie the Optimist]

Nonsense, top managers don't they won't accept that, they pick up trophies on the way, he's not a top manager.

Sorry but 6 years of largely cr*p if I'm honest isn't good enough, we've been predictable, lazy, lacked organisation and tactics and have seen the same problems year on year, in addition failing to plan for the loss of our better players, that's not management that's complacency, the guy never learns from his mistakes and always has an excuse, he's had his chance blown it big time and somehow he' still here? He should gone several years ago.

It amazes me you criticise footballers and yet don't criticise a manager earning 7+ million a year when he's winning nothing and no I couldn't give a toss what the board thinks, he should have more pride in his job than that...unless money is the only thing he's interested in of course!

that exactly what you do except the other way round and you are pulling someone else up on it? jesus wept

[Cripps_orig]

How do you know the biggest offer was from city? The only thing we've heard from them (which may or may not be true like anything lese) is they WOULDN'T meet his wage demands. That doesn't sound like agreeing terms to me.

Cos its City?

They have nothing else to offer but money.

They dont have a history, tradition etc

[Niall_Quinn]

Nonsense, top managers don't they won't accept that, they pick up trophies on the way, he's not a top manager.

Sorry but 6 years of largely cr*p if I'm honest isn't good enough, we've been predictable, lazy, lacked organisation and tactics and have seen the same problems year on year, that's not management that's complacency, the guy never learns from his mistakes and always has an excuse, he's had his chance blown it big time and somehow he' still here? He should gone several years ago.

It amazes me you criticise footballers and yet don't criticise a manager earning 7+ million a year when he's winning nothing and no I couldn't give a toss what the board thinks, he should have more pride in his job than that...unless money is the only thing he's interested in of course!

Wenger has no pride in his job? Are you serious? You don't care what the people who run the club think?

I don't just criticise players, I criticise the lot. Players, managers, boards, the authorities, the media, everyone who is turning football to shit. But some people just criticise Wenger. That's it. He's responsible for everything ranging from team selection to the Titanic and Apollo 13.

[Niall_Quinn]

Cos its City?

They have nothing else to offer but money.

They dont have a history, tradition etc

Okay, I get you. You're just making stuff up to support a bad argument.

[Ollie the Optimist]

Cos its City?

They have nothing else to offer but money.

They dont have a history, tradition etc

and chelsea do?