i wouldn't mind abusing her
i wouldn't mind abusing her
To his bargaining position? I was talking about ours. Or lack thereof.
Here, let me explain it this way.
When a buying club knows you have to sell, your bargaining position is weak.
When a buying club knows you do not have to sell, your bargaining position is strong.
When a buying club is not sure, it's a game of cat and mouse. Hence the posturing about keeping him to the last year of his contract.
By releasing this statement Rvp has removed the element of doubt, he wants to burn bridges, making it effectively impossible to hold him to his contract. It's a calculated move to engineer his big payday. From the club's point of view - a dick move, but from vanPersie's, it's only business.
The only hope the club has of strengthening their position is to rope in as many buyers as possible.
agents would've known about the real situation even if RVP had not released a statement and arsenal had not done either.
something becoming 'official' on the net is usually a few steps behind what anyone on the inside will know.
the statement makes no difference to the price we would have and will generate
I'm in total disagreement that RVP made his statement in retalliation for anything PHW said, for 2 reasons. Firstly, what does it matter to the player (or more importantly his advisers who have advised him to say what he has said) what our chairman says? Its obvious that this is a lawyer's/agent's statement - not something deriving from the player himself. This is not a passionate reaction to perceived maltreatment. In fact its difficult to envisage a more cynical, dispassionate statement. It has been made to secure an advantage, not as a tit for tat measure.
Second, even if the above is wrong, and his motivation was (as you argue) simply to put the record straight why not leave it as clarifing that he does not wish to re-sign? Why put the boot in and damage the club - while at the same time making him look like a ****. You say there's no evidence of any tapping up. Well there is no evidence that there hasn;t been any tapping up - but its crystal clear that what has been said has been said with the express intention of making his position untenable, and preventing the club from holding him to the final year of his contract. Fuck all to do with what PHW has, or has not said, IMO.
Putting the laughter back into manslaughter
We're in a slightly stronger position than we were with Cesc as we knew he'd only sign for one club. Everyone knew he'd only sign for one club. So we couldn't start a bidding war. On the other hand he was younger and worth more because of that. We're not going to get loads for him. I initially thought we should keep him because of that but having read other people's views about the damage that would do to the dressing room I've changed my mind. We should get rid and accept it's not going to be for silly money.
Look its easy, he can earn £120k a week with us and not win anything or he can earn £200k a week at citeh and win everything
Also Nasri is his BFF so he will want to go shag him
What's the difference between a statement in the public domain and his agent whoring him quietly to every club in the world?
The difference with a public statment is that he now cannot stay, not at least without a public climbdown.
"I cannot agree with the way this club is run, but I have decided to lower myself and take their money for one more year."
With the ego's involved on both sides, that is unlikely.