Originally Posted by AKBapologist
errm.....he's already said he wants out.
errm.....he's already said he wants out.
He said he won't be signing a new contract. It doesn't exclude the possiblity of him running his current one down.
But it was okay for the club chairman, whilst they've slapped a gagging order on RVP, to come out and indirectly say he's only after money and not loyal like the Giggs of this world? When he decided to tell his side of things IN THE SAME WAY, he is a traitor?
Tell you what, why hasn't Hill-wood and co invested any of their own money in the club? At least the likes of abrahmovich puts their own money into thier clubs --- not to increase their share values then flog them off to make a tidy sum!
And that would be in his best interest how?
Players who can join clubs on a free get massive signing on bonuses if there any good.
well, not when you are 30 and looking for a long term contract.
The Giggs comparison is funny. United look after their old players, even when they're on the decline. We push them out the door quickly so we can make as much money off them before their valuation plummets.
Depends on how good a season you had before hand. If all the top clubs are interested, they'd all be willing to offer 3-4 year contracts at silly wages knowing they didn't have to give anyone a transfer fee.
Lets leave aside what I think of Van Persie's tactics here.
I find it staggering that a man who was part of a cabal that profited to the tune of half a billion pounds without investing a penny in the club has the temerity to spout about player greed.
would arsenal offer that kind of contract? ---- actually, you said 'top club'.
But then I doubt any player at that age, in their right mind, would take such a chance. What if they get a serious injury? Not a sensible chance to take.
Last edited by gooners; 08-08-2012 at 10:46 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote