Good Bye RVP!

[Ollie the Optimist]

You are right. The time to have stayed with the flow, when we were seen as one of the big boys, is long gone. PHW, AW and co spent most of their time criticising what their richer friends were doing -- all the while hiding behind self-sustainability.

AW: if you give me a 100mil and tell me to put it in the squad, I will give it back! I don't want to bankrupt the club.

Me: hey fucker, it's my money, take it and use it to stay competitive -- to move with the times -- rather than bang on about what rich owner fans are doing! It is about more than money.

wenger was given money this year, he spent 35 million of it. the difference being is he spends wisely and gets more out of the money then someone like liverpool who just buy shit for lots of money

[GP]

you have to wonder why a player who has seen his manager and hte man who made him the player he is today called a paedo by 70k of his new clubs fans, called a rapist himself would want to play for said club.


oh wait its money. the judas money grabbing ****

Spot on.

[gooners]

wenger was given money this year, he spent 35 million of it. the difference being is he spends wisely and gets more out of the money then someone like liverpool who just buy shit for lots of money

There we go again, sticking our noses into other clubs' business. I am sure I could name clubs that have splashed silly money and WON stuff. But then why bother.

[Joker]

wenger was given money this year, he spent 35 million of it. the difference being is he spends wisely and gets more out of the money then someone like liverpool who just buy shit for lots of money

The difference being that we seem to need to sell to buy. Our net spend is negative, which is either because the board are telling Wenger to balance the books or he has taken it upon himself to do so,all in the name of "self sustainability". Surely it wouldn't hurt to run a deficit for one transfer window? Especially given that there's surely been an accumulation of funds from previous windows that haven't been spent.

[Marc Overmars]

Has he updated the fans yet?

It's probably best for him to keep quiet. Giving it all the "I will always love the club" shite is only going to rile us.

[Ollie the Optimist]

There we go again, sticking our noses into other clubs' business. I am sure I could name clubs that have splashed silly money and WON stuff. But then why bother.

if you want to win that way then fuck off to city. no pride in that.

[Ollie the Optimist]

It's probably best for him to keep quiet. Giving it all the "I will always love the club" shite is only going to rile us.

its best he never ever speaks about us again.

[Joker]

if you want to win that way then fuck off to city. no pride in that.

LOL so spending money to buy better players to help a club compete is somehow "immoral"? And are you really saying that our successes weren't at least partly down to spending money to get in top quality players? Or Utd's successes?

[gooners]

if you want to win that way then fuck off to city. no pride in that.

I'd rather you go f**K yourself tbh. But that won't happen either.

[Ollie the Optimist]

LOL so spending money to buy better players to help a club compete is somehow "immoral"? And are you really saying that our successes weren't at least partly down to spending money to get in top quality players? Or Utd's successes?

spending 35 million on three players is ok. spending 100s of millions on three players is not. operating a football club where you spend 117% of your entire turnover on wages etc is not accepatbel and no pride in wining.

all clubs need to spend money to win, however there is a difference between what we spend and city spend and why one way is much better