Good Bye RVP!

[Ollie the Optimist]

I was just gonna post that.

To me that shows that wenger had the balls to tell RVP to fuck off.

Fair play wenger.

exactly. same with song too. he is meant to have had a disgusting attiude in trianing this week, so wenger has told him to fuck off to.

angry wenger is awesome

[Letters]

I don't find wondering which billionaire's plaything will finish above which other billionaire's plaything that exciting.
The top 3 will be City, Utd and Chelsea. I don't know which order, I don't really care.

I suppose it's a bit better than when it was just us or Utd but at least we were both there on merit, not because someone had pumped money into us till we blundered our way to the top.

[Ollie the Optimist]

Let me get this right, RvP disrespects us with his statement, AW spends some fucking money on quality, RvP wants to stay. AW "Fuck You" LOL
from @sexyfootball_eu


made me laugh

[Ollie the Optimist]

Yeah id still rather have their season than ours as would we all

Apart from you

the end result yes, the way they did no


there is no pride in spending the amount they did to win, nor in just defending for every minute of all the knockout games they played. if we were too do taht, would rather win nothing and get third

[gooners]

I don't find wondering which billionaire's plaything will finish above which other billionaire's plaything that exciting.
The top 3 will be City, Utd and Chelsea. I don't know which order, I don't really care.

I suppose it's a bit better than when it was just us or Utd but at least we were both there on merit, not because someone had pumped money into us till we blundered our way to the top.

not happened in any of those clubs' case, i'm afraid.

[hobson's choice]

spending 35 million on three players is ok. spending 100s of millions on three players is not. operating a football club where you spend 117% of your entire turnover on wages etc is not accepatbel and no pride in wining.

all clubs need to spend money to win, however there is a difference between what we spend and city spend and why one way is much better

Who cares how they spend their money, and how much they spend. These is a business, where the objective is to win, not to play the game fair. I'm all for balance, and equality, but until something is created, in a way of salary cap or whatever. It's a free market, and you got flaunt it and spend it.

[Ollie the Optimist]

not happened in any of those clubs' case, i'm afraid.

chelsea hadnt won a league title for 50 years, suddenly after abrovomich spends over 100m they win one, city who were relegated ten years ago and were always mid table suddenly spent over 500 million and win the league title. kind of shows they did blunder their way to the top

[Letters]

not happened in any of those clubs' case, i'm afraid.

Wait. Are you saying that City and Chelsea didn't win trophies last year because of the ridiculous amounts of money both spent?



Utd have spent big too although their spending is more from money they've earned from previous success - well, that and mortgaging themselves up to the eyeballs and having a brilliant manager.

[Letters]

Who cares how they spend their money, and how much they spend. These is a business.

Well, it is. But it used to be a sport. I'm old enough to remember when it was.

[gooners]

I'm all for balance, and equality, but until something is created, in a way of salary cap or whatever. It's a free market, and you got flaunt it and spend it.

well said that man!